Stable Genius and the Wack Attack: Democrats Collude With Soviet Psychiatry Again, Expecting Different Result

"Who made every one of his critics pair his name with the word 'genius' for the next month?"--Scott Adams


"Hopefully, we can save the patient, and, who knows, maybe one day he'll be as sane as we are!"

Oh, Please, Oh, Please, Oh, Please, Oh, Please Try It:

Vox: "There is a growing call from a group of psychiatrists — the best medical experts at interpreting aberrant human behavior — for exactly this: an emergency evaluation of the president’s mental capacity, by force if necessary.

Leading this call is Bandy Lee, an assistant professor in forensic psychiatry (the interface of law and mental health) at the Yale School of Medicine who has devoted her 20-year career to studying, predicting, and preventing violence.

She recently briefed a dozen members of Congress — Democrats and one Republican — on the president’s mental state. And this week, she, along with Judith Herman at Harvard and Robert Jay Lifton at Columbia, released a statement arguing that Trump is “further unraveling.”

"Time for your psych evaluation, Trump."

"We encounter this often in mental health. Those who most require an evaluation are the least likely to submit to one. That is the reason why in all 50 states we have not only the legal authority, but often the legal obligation, to contain someone even against their will when it’s an emergency.

So in an emergency, neither consent nor confidentiality requirements hold. Safety comes first. What we do in the case of danger is we contain the person, we remove them from access to weapons, and we do an urgent evaluation.

This is what we have been calling for with the president based on basic medical standards of care.

Surprisingly, many lawyer groups have actually volunteered, on their own, to file for a court paper to ensure that the security staff will cooperate with us. But we have declined, since this will really look like a coup, and while we are trying to prevent violence, we don’t wish to incite it through, say, an insurrection."

Thank you, Sigmund Fraud. The insurrection would be yours, Doc. As is the mental illness.

As the President pointed out on Twitter, they tried this on Reagan, too. And on all conservatives even before the Gipper's presidency. From the Archives:

Ed Driscoll: Piereson's new book Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism...argues both that Kennedy was a victim of the Cold War, and that the repression of his killer's ideology caused tremendous psychological damage to the collective health of the nation.

It was during the 1950s and early '60s that that liberal elites declared America's nascent and disparate conservative movements to be a greater threat to the nation than the Soviet Union, as illustrated by films of the day such as Dr. Strangelove and The Manchurian Candidate. And the subtext of those films was very much based upon "a vast literature that developed in the '50s and early '60s about the threat from the far right," Piereson says, specifically mentioning Richard Hofstadter's The Paranoid Style In American Politics, and Daniel Bell's The Radical Right.

As Piereson writes, leading up to Kennedy's fateful trip to Dallas, there was a remarkable amount of violence in the south, caused by a backlash against the civil rights movement. In October of 1963, Adlai Stevenson, the Democrats' presidential candidate in the 1950s who had been appointed the ambassador to the UN by Kennedy, traveled to Dallas for a speech on United Nations Day. Stevenson is heckled, booed, spat upon, and hit over the head with a cardboard sign. Stevenson says publicly, there's a "spirit of madness" in Texas. And Kennedy's White House staffers believe that he should cancel his already announced November visit to Dallas.

Thus, at the beginning of November 1963 a framework has been established that the far right is the threat to American democracy, "and that they've moved from heated rhetoric to violent act," Piereson says.

"So when the news spreads that Kennedy has been killed, the immediate response is that it must be a right winger who's done it," Piereson notes. And while the Birch-era right definitely had severe issues, JFK's assassin on November 22, 1963 had, of course, a polar opposite ideology. "When the word is now spread that Oswald has been captured, and that he has a communist past, and they start running film of him demonstrating for Castro in the previous summer, there is a tremendous disorientation at this."

The shock that Kennedy was in reality a victim of the Cold War simply did not compute on a national level. This was in stark contrast to the narrative that framed the death of Abraham Lincoln a century prior.

In contrast, "Liberals had great difficulty assimilating this idea that a communist would kill Kennedy. It made sense to them that an anti-civil rights person might do it, or an anti-communist might do it, but not a communist."...
"However, that is not how the Kennedy assassination was interpreted," Piereson says, with enormous understatement. Instead, a sense of collective guilt is imposed on the nation through its liberal elites and media. "And this is really the first time that you get on the liberal-left this idea that America is guilty. But this however now becomes a metaphor for the left for everything that happens moving on in the 1960s."

"So how do you get, really, from this place in 1963, where Kennedy is shot by a communist, to '68 where communists like Castro are heroes to the left?"

Piereson believes this could have only happened due to the cultural disorientation caused by the airbrushing of Kennedy's assassination and the attempt to "view it as a civil rights event, instead of a Cold War event."

The conspiracy theories were also fueled by propaganda generated by the Soviet Union and Cuba, Piereson adds. The Soviet Union itself "was very quickly out of the box on November 23, 1963. TASS claimed that Oswald was being setup; and that the real assassins were Klansmen, rightists and 'Birchists' as they called them. They all claimed that it was a right wing conspiracy which brought Kennedy down. And some of them said that Barry Goldwater was responsible."

Which seems to neatly foreshadow the wild conspiracy theories that reached their zenith in Oliver Stone's 1991 film JFK, which paints Oswald as a near-completely innocent victim and pins Kennedy's assassination on virtually everyone from the mafia to LBJ. Stone's 1995 follow-up, Nixon, would, not surprisingly, also implicate its title character in Kennedy's assassination as well.

But such conspiracy theories actually began almost immediately after the Warren Commission report was issued in 1964. As Piereson writes in Camelot and the Cultural Revolution, conspiracy theorists used the Warren Commission as their guide to understanding the assassination, even while simultaneously concocting reasons why everything in the report was in error. Piereson places this into context by noting that a sort of flip-over had begun to occur in the mid-1960s, with the left increasingly sounding like the paranoid Birchers of the 1950s.

This was a trait that a few journalists had spotted even before the far left's recent attempts had gotten started to conflate 9/11 into a conspiracy theory involving President Bush, the Pentagon, and presumably everyone in the federal and local governments.

Similarly, the overheated language of the modern left, such as Al Gore's attempt to demonize his critics as "Digital Brownshirts" begins to grow out of this mid-1960s period. "Just as the Birch Society had accused Eisenhower of being a communist," Piereson says, "by the late sixties, the liberals and leftists were accusing everyone else with being Nazis and fascists. That, and anti-Americanism. These now became features of the left."

The psychological discord in the wake of JFK's assassination also destroyed the line that had previously separated New Deal-style liberals with the more extreme hard left. "The anti-Americanism and the conspiracy theorizing and the rough political language characterized by the left now enters into liberalism," Piereson says.

"Oswald turned out to be one of the most consequential assassins in history," Piereson says. "He's a communist who shoots the president of the United States. You would think that there would be a reaction against communism. But there is no reaction against communism in the United States after Kennedy's killed. In fact, communism is the vogue," particularly on college campuses.

Which may be the most curious element of Kennedy's death: Oswald may have been the ultimate "liberal in a hurry," as communists were often called during the Cold War. But Kennedy's death and the left's reaction to it caused many sixties and seventies liberal ideas to become seemingly frozen in amber. Which is the final remarkable paradox for a group that likes to call itself "progressive" these days.".......

For them, Trump's election--and Bribe-Me Granny's defeat--is 9/11, the Reagan Revolution and the Kennedy Assassination all rolled into one. With some Weather-Worship Hysteria sprinkled on top--partly cloudy with a 100% chance of Trumphausen Syndrome.

Now, blaming Trump with the Russians, they're as crazy as bedbugs. Again. 

Tucker Carlson: "Extremism in the pursuit of Trump is no vice."

Neither is the pursuit of sanity. Try it for a change.".......

Also from the Archives, a second opinion, Doctor: The Hill:

"Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) reportedly plans to file a bill that would require the White House to have an in-house psychiatrist.

“I’m looking at it from the perspective of, if there are questions about the mental health of the president of the United States, what may be the best way to get the president treatment? We’re now in the 21st century. Mental health is just as important as physical health. His disconnection from the truth is incredibly disturbing. When you add on top of that his stifling of dissent, his attacks on the free press and his attacks on the legitimacy of judiciary, that then takes us down the road toward authoritarianism. That’s why I’ve concluded he is a danger to the republic,” Lieu argued." with the voices in his head.

It's the same old story.

All Republicans since Eisenhower have been nuclear madmen, even though Harry Truman dropped the Big One. Instead of arguing on the merits, Democrat/Communists dismiss us as mental cases, which was the preferred method of Soviet psychiatrists for opponents of the regime.

Ever since Communist Richard Hofstadter's 1965 classic, The Paranoid Style in American Politics, Democrats have been practicing their own brand of Soviet psychiatry. That was back when Democrats themselves went off the rails, twisting themselves into knots trying to process Lee Harvey Oswald's murderous communism as a conservative event. Mirror, mirror...

And now they think men should pee with your wives and shower with your daughters, that Iran should get nukes and that the FBI should pick our presidents for our own good.

But Trump is the crazy one. Right.

Nutty then. Nutty now. #NuttyForever!


"Nuke the Moon Again!"

Nurse Rached--UPDATE: Our Strictly-Professional, Completely Unbiased
Mental Health Professional Bandy Lee was on PMS-NBC last year
ranting about the raciss phrase "Make America Great Again".
For the record, the campaign slogan was also used by Reagan in 1984,
Bill Clinton in 1992 and Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Lee: “As more time passes, we come closer to the greatest risk of danger,
one that could even mean the extinction of the human species.
This is not hyperbole.
This is the reality.”

I'll summon the orderlies.

Both Ways-UPDATE:

I heard a snippet on the radio today saying
"police are not calling it a terrorist attack"...
which reminded me; their Soviet Psych Job works both ways.

They try to upgrade a political disagreement with Trump
into a mental health issue, and downgrade terrorist knifings
and vehicle attacks into a mental health issue, too.

Ironically, this is one of the reasons Trump got elected.

Crazy, huh?