An Opened Letter to the President

"In our country the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State."--Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, 1974

To: The Honorable Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America

Dear Mr. President,

17 Intelligence Agencies all agree--wiretapping your political opponents is the very essence of good government and the mark of normal democratic processes.

It was at this point in the last presidential cycle that spies were inserted into your campaign by the CIA, your campaign was wiretapped by the FBI, the NSA data-bases were exploited by opposition researchers and leaks of fictional smears were planted in the press and given to FISA judges.

And Official Washington was just fine with it. So it must the right thing to do. It must be a wonderful celebration of our democracy, so it is your right--no, your DUTY--to share this beautiful American tradition with your Democrat opponents.

Remember; whatever they may say, deep down they approve of this partisan spying, smearing and frame-up. That's why they have been so silent when it was done to you.

You owe it to future generations to continue this vibrant American Police State tradition that was handed down to you, Mr. President.

Happy Spying, sir!

(ps; The preceding letter is what the Human-American Community refers to as a "spoof". We do not actually recommend that this President use the entire Nat/Sec Apparatus as an arm of his campaign, even though that is exactly what was done to him--and more importantly, to the free citizens of a free nation. In fact, his integrity forbids it, as he is restoring the American Constitutional Republic and George Washington's legacy in a city that dishonors Washington's name on a daily basis. 

In an era of Social Justice Schoolmarms, prosecutorial Pecksniffs and Big Tech political censors of the old Soviet school, we want to make it clear to even the most obtuse dullards JoeBiden that this letter is "humor", employing "irony", "sarcasm" and, rarely, "wit", all of which might have prevented this power-mad Spy-Gate Debacle in the first place. Consider yourself disclaimed and on behalf of the members of the entire Chmeller family, let me extend my warmest yada yada yada. 

Selah.)

Before the Glory Fades: The Weissman/Mueller Dirty Dossier 

Ace asks: "If he feared public confusion, why did he not issue an interim finding a year or two ago and tell people there was no Russian collusion?"

The mid-terms, for one thing. 

But the entire Weissman/Mueller Fraud was an attempt to manufacture the Process Crime of Obstruction. (They knew there was no Collusion, because this was the same FBI/DOJ team that had been trying to manufacture it long before they hired Mueller.)

When the news was announced that Rosenstein had appointed Mueller, Dirty Jeff Sessions offered his resignation. If the President had accepted it then, that would have been called Obstruction.

They also tried to bait President Trump into firing Mueller--that would have been called Obstruction. Same with Rosenstein. That's why it took so long. They needed time to bait the President.

Throwing Manafort in the dungeon was pardon-bait for Obstruction. Railroading Flynn. Sending an army to Roger Stone's. All of it designed to entrap Stable Genius in pardons, to be called Obstruction. But he didn't bite. But if not for Bob Barr, they probably would have indicted anyway. 

Mueller was alarmed when Pelosi just called Barr a liar because that puts Mueller in the middle. And like Rosenstein,  his goal now is just to slink back under his rock without being charged himself. 

He knows what's coming. 

The Weissman/Mueller Grift is completely played out now. Democrats may still complain about it, but it is all aimed at disqualifying Atty. Gen. Barr, in hopes of keeping the Obama/Clinton Crime Family out of the federal penitentiaries.

"In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers . . . we are ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations."-- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn "The Gulag Archipelago".

Another Open Letter--UPDATE: Rush Limbaugh excerpts from White House Counsel Emmet Flood's letter to Attorney General Barr:

“Dear Mr. Attorney General: I write on behalf of the office of the president to memorialize concerns relating to the special counsel report and to address executive privilege issues associated with its release.” And that right there tells you, executive privilege issues, they’re getting ready for hardball.

Now, the Flood letter is the White House response to the Mueller report. And parts of this letter are classically excellent and great and had me standing up and cheering, while at the same time making my blood boil all over again to realize what actually was perpetrated here.

“The SCO Report suffers from an extraordinary legal defect: It quite deliberately fails to comply with the requirements of governing law.” In other words, the White House response is this report is not even legal.

“Lest the report’s release be taken as a precedent or perceived as somehow legitimating the defect,” the lawlessness of the report. “I write with both the president and future presidents in mind to make the following points clear.  I begin with the SCO stated conclusion on the obstruction question: The SCO concluded that the evidence ‘prevent[ed] [it] from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred.’ But conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred was not the SCO’s assigned task, because making conclusive determinations of innocence is never the task of the federal prosecutor.  What prosecutors are supposed to do is complete an investigation and then either ask the grand jury to return an indictment or decline to charge the case,” and that is it.

“When prosecutors decline to charge, they make that decision not because they have conclusively determin[ed] that no criminal conduct occurred, but rather because they do not believe that the investigated conduct constitutes a crime for which all the elements can be proven to the satisfaction of a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.”

In other words, if you don’t think you can make the case, if you’ve investigated, you’re a prosecutor, and you don’t have the goods, you drop it. You don’t keep searching until you can exonerate the accused because that’s not the job of any prosecutor. The prosecutor either has the goods or he doesn’t. If he doesn’t, that’s it. He doesn’t announce what he’s got, he doesn’t impugn the accused, he doesn’t say “we couldn’t conclusively exonerate.” You don’t do any of that. And that’s why this report, Mr. Flood essentially says on many other points, is illegal, essentially violates the law and ethics.

“In the American justice system,” Mr. Attorney General, “innocence is presumed; there is never any need for prosecutors to conclusively determine,” the innocence of the accused because that’s the starting point. The accused never has to establish his innocence. He never has to exonerate himself. And it’s not the job of the prosecutor to exonerate because the accused is innocent from the get-go. And if you can’t prove it, you don’t have a case.

This is why I’ve said this report can be done in two pages. It didn’t need 448. All those pages are to slime and smear Trump by listing a bunch of garbage that could not be used to even charge him with a crime and so that stuff should never even have been included is the basic point Flood is making here. That stuff is prejudicial, it’s defamatory. And the fact that you include is when you can’t use it to even make a charge is outrageous. This report has no business being released, period. It had no business being produced as it was, and we’re getting it on record here from the White House that we think this is a travesty of the American judicial system.

“Second, and equally importantly, in closing its investigation, the SCO [Special Counsel’s Office] had only one job, to ‘provide the attorney general with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination [declining to prosecute] decisions reached by the special counsel.’ Yet the one thing the SCO was obligated to do is the very thing the SCO intentionally and unapologetically refused to do.

“The SCO made neither a prosecution decision not a declination decision on the obstruction question. Instead. it transmitted a 182-page discussion of raw evidentiary material combined with its own inconclusive observations on the arguable legal significance of the gathered content. As a result, none of the report’s Volume II complied with the obligation imposed by the governing regulation to ‘explain the prosecution or declination decisions reached.'” In other words, they submitted 180-some-odd pages of Trump BS, things that they don’t like that Trump did.

Not things that made them decide or not that he was chargeable or not.  They just planted a bunch of BS destined for the House, destined for impeachment, in violation of the charge that special counsels have.  You either produce the evidence that you’re using to charge, or you explain why you’re declining to charge.  But you don’t do what Mueller has done! You don’t list all of this raw stuff that is essentially what an FBI file would say before it’s been vetted.  The only reason… They’re livid about this at the White House, and they damn well ought to be.

“The [Special Counsel’s Office] instead produced a prosecutorial curiosity part ‘truth commission’ report and part law school exam paper.”  This is another key part here: “The president is aware that, had he chosen to do so, he could have withheld such information,” talking about how much cooperation there was in the previous paragraph, how many witnesses, how many documents, how many pages, how cooperative they were with Mueller.

“The president is aware that had he chosen to do so, he could have withheld such information on executive privilege grounds, basing such an assertion on the established principle that to permit release of such information might have a chilling effect on a president’s advisers, causing them to be less than fully frank…”  This is setting up that they’re gonna start declaring executive privilege, and they’re gonna do it on McGahn, because that’s what these clowns in the House want.  They don’t even want Mueller.  They don’t really want Barr.  They want a piece of Mueller, but they really want McGahn — and this is a telegraphing that we’re playing hardball now.

Screw you people! We’re gonna start declaring executive privilege.  We could have done it with Mueller, and we didn’t because we chose to be cooperative.  (Final little excerpt here…)  “Not so long ago, the idea that a law enforcement official…” This is about Comey. “Not so long ago, the idea that a law enforcement official might provide the press with confidential governmental information for the proclaimed purpose of prompting a criminal investigation of an identified individual would have troubled Americans of all political persuasions.

“That the head of our country’s top law enforcement agency [the FBI] has actually done so to the president of the United States should frighten every friend of individual liberty. Under our system of government, unelected executive branch officers and intelligence agency personnel are supposed to answer to the person elected by the people — the president — and not the other way around.”  These people don’t answer to Comey! Nobody answers to Comey in the executive branch.

“This is not a Democratic or a Republican issue; it is a matter of having a government responsible to the people, and, again, not the other way around. In the partisan commotion surrounding the released report, it would be well to remember that what can be done to a president can be done to any of us.” 

RUSH:  Now, this Emmet Flood letter to William Barr I just excerpted to you, I think indicates that the White House now on the warpath.  I think that’s why Comey had his op-ed a couple days ago, and the honeypot story in the New York Times about Papadopoulos, admitting the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign. It’s all starting to come together now.

RUSH: We were overtaken by that the New York Times story yesterday.  I fretted all day that maybe I was spending too much time on it, but then I found out today, “No way!”  It was crucially important, because the upshot of it was that the New York Times was forced to admit the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign, something Obama has denied, something Clapper has denied, something Brennan has denied. They’ve all denied it, but they had to admit it yesterday."...….

Read it all.