Friday, December 17, 2021

Beware the Pharmaceutical-Industrial Complex: What Would Eisenhower Do?

WWED: What Would Eisenhower Do? 

Well, for starters, he wouldn't have let the Pentagon fund the creation of the Virus in the first place. But that is exactly what was done in conjunction with the CIA, the NIH and Our Trusted Chinese Partners(tm).

Actual President Dwight D. Eisenhower was a patriot general who built an army to invade and liberate Europe for the cause of Civilization.

Tony Fauci is a traitor bureaucrat who built a virus to invade and conquer America for the cause of Globalism. And his greed–always the greed.

And the American patriot who insisted the Nazi Death Camps be filmed for History, and who presided over the original Nuremberg Trials, would have never ordered American troops to be forcibly injected with experimental gene therapies in violation of the Nuremberg Code, simple human decency and all common sense.

Military Members Seek New Injunction Against COVID Vaccine Mandates • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)

"...Judge Winsor acknowledged that under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) statute, “recipients of EUA drugs must be ‘informed’ … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” Judge Winsor also pointed out that DOD’s guidance documents explicitly state only FDA-licensed COVID vaccines are mandated. While this would be applicable to the Comirnaty vaccine, the judge noted:

“The plaintiffs have shown that the DOD is requiring injections from vials not labeled ‘Comirnaty.’ Indeed, defense counsel could not even say whether vaccines labeled ‘Comirnaty’ exist at all.”

Miller said the FDA’s “wrongful conclusion” that two distinct vaccines can be ‘interchangeable'” is one of the claims in the amended complaint. Miller told The Defender:

“Τhe FDA incorrectly determined that the EUA Pfizer vaccine can be used interchangeably with the licensed Comirnaty vaccine. Whether the FDA can make that determination is currently being litigated. And this FDA determination presents a significant problem for military service members. With the Comirnaty vaccine being unavailable, those in the military are improperly being forced to take an EUA vaccine.”

DOD violated own vaccine mandate guidance, plaintiffs allege

The plaintiffs’ amended complaint cites five primary causes of action, including two new causes related to the FDA’s “wrongful conclusion that two distinct vaccines can be ‘interchangeable.’” Miller said black letter law states products issued under a EUA are rescinded once a fully licensed alternative becomes available.

On this basis, the plaintiffs filed a claim of action in relation to the armed services’ violation of the DOD’s own vaccine mandate, wherein service members are being mandated to receive the vaccines administered under a EUA instead of the Comirnaty vaccine, which the military claims is “unavailable.”

As part of their amended complaint, the plaintiffs are now once again requesting injunctive relief from the court, including declaratory judgment from the “unlawful” mandate, which they argue is in violation of AR 40-562, DOD procedural requirements, the APA, and federal informed consent laws.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs are requesting a declaratory judgment on the basis that federal law only permits fully licensed vaccines to be mandated for members of the armed service, and to that end, “implementation of the mandate are [sic] unlawful to the extent that they permit or require an EUA product to be administered pursuant to the mandate.”

The plaintiffs additionally request that any implementation of the DOD vaccine mandate be enjoined, that plaintiffs “with natural immunity due to previous infection are entitled to a medical exemption from COVID-19 vaccination under AR 40-562,” and that the DOD and the armed services be enjoined from treating the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine “as if” it were the licensed Comirnaty vaccine, and that this practice be declared unlawful.

The FDA is also the target of the plaintiffs’ claims for relief, as they are requesting that the FDA’s approval of the Comirnaty vaccine be declared unlawful, and that this decision be vacated and remanded, “for reconsideration consistent with [applicable] laws and regulations.”

Accordingly, the plaintiffs further request that a declaratory judgment be issued against the FDA presenting it from simultaneously treating “the same product as an EUA product and licensed product for the same indication and use” or using the BioNTech and Comirnaty vaccines “interchangeably” or in a way where they can be “substituted” for each other.

As The Defender reported, even though the Comirnaty vaccine was fully licensed by the FDA, an EUA for the very same vaccine was also issued, shielding it from liability laws applicable only to licensed products. Trial is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.

  • Air Force Staff Sergeant Samuel Craymer, stationed at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, inquired about the availability of the Comirnaty vaccine after receiving his vaccination orders in September. He was told that it was unavailable and that he was required to take an EUA vaccine, and was shown several vials of the vaccine being administered, which was the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA vaccine. Upon challenging the lawfulness of the order to take the EUA vaccine via a complaint filed with the DOD Inspector General, he received an Article 15 violation for “failing to follow a lawful order.” A religious accommodation request remains pending.
  • Similarly, Air Force Major Kacy Dixon, in response to the vaccination order she received, inquired about the availability of the licensed Comirnaty vaccine from pharmacies and other healthcare providers. Upon being told it was unavailable, she sought clarification as to whether she was being obliged to take an unlicensed vaccine, and was informed that she must take the “interchangeable” Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Her subsequent request for a medical waiver on the basis of “lack of [licensed] vaccine supply” was denied, as was her appeal. Moreover, her request for a medical exemption, filed because she is breastfeeding, was also denied."....... Read it all.
How can Pfizer hold both a Full Vaccine Approval--and an Emergency Use Approval at the same time? And then claim they are "interchangeable"?

Not only are Pfizer's approved and unnapproved experimental gene therapies called "interchangble" with each other, but are said to be "interchangeable" with Moderna and Johnson & Johnson's.

Are the vaccine deaths and injuries also interchangable?

What if a doctor told you he wanted all the privileges and benefits of being a licensed medical professional--but would only treat you under the legal liability exemptions granted to Good Samaritan bystanders in an emergency? And then claim they were "interchangeable"? Simply put, they want it both ways. And All the Time. 

It bears repeating; it is a malicious and criminal fraud to offer troops exemptions that you know do not exist. And on a human level, it's just a slimy and shitty thing to do to another human being--especially one entrusted to you.

We are all endowed with an Unalienable Vaccine Passport by our Heavenly Father.
 

Today's military command are largely ass-kissers and moral cowards who would rather poison their own troops than stop sucking Joe Biden's dick for money and status.

"Interchangeably".

ps; by "Joe Biden", I mean, of course, "Obama". And by "dick", I also mean Obama.


RFK"On my birthday in January 1961, three days before I watched my uncle John F. Kennedy take his oath as president of the United States, outgoing President Dwight Eisenhower, in his farewell address, warned our country about the emergence of a Military Industrial Complex that would obliterate our democracy. In that speech, Eisenhower made an equally urgent — although less celebrated — warning against the emergence of a federal bureaucracy, which, he believed, posed an equally dire threat to America’s Constitution and her values..."

Science. Medicine. The Agencies. The Rule of Law. The politicians. The military. All corrupted now.

Actual President Eisenhower made sure photographs were taken of Hitler's Death Camps so madmen like Gates, Collins and Fauci couldn't do it again. He smelled these criminal ghouls coming from 60 years away.

Do me a favor. If you haven't already airbrushed the man from History, take the name of Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower off of any remaining military facilities.

He doesn't know you people.















Salute this. 
........................................................................................................................

Jesse Kelly: "REMINDER: Joe Biden got 13 of our warriors killed and then checked his watch repeatedly when he met the families as if he had somewhere else to be.

Jesse Kelly:  "I’ve never been that mad in life. I cannot believe we tossed those 13 warriors away like trash and they didn’t even care. Here’s the link. I almost got choked up at the opening I was so pissed. Here’s the link. I almost got choked up at the opening I was so pissed. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the


Jesse Kelly: "Good call. No need to train for amphibious assault. It’s pretty easy stuff. What’s the worst that can happen? After all, look how seamless Tarawa was..."

"We don't need a military that's woman-friendly, that's gay friendly. We need a military that is flat-out hostile. We need Type-A men who want to sit on a throne of Chinese skulls, but we don't have that now. We can't get women off of naval vessels, that should be step one but most are pregnant anyway. Our military, though, they're focused on the important things we want to focus on: climate change, and we definitely have to make sure there are enough tampons in the [mens] restroom at the Pentagon."

The headlines tell the tale:





They call it a “Department of Defense”–but you do not defend that which you do not love.

That is why they no longer defend America. They do not love America--in fact, they hate it. Except as a place to grift. And to force their perverted views on an unwilling People.


pictured here, a Communist tyrant shakes hands

while bowing.
They even suck as traitors. But traitors they nonetheless remain.

WWED?


A: Whatever It Takes

No comments:

Post a Comment