"If you don't want a man unhappy politically, don't give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none."--Ray Bradbury's chief book-burner, Capt. Beatty, in "Fahrenheit 451", the temperature at which "book paper" auto-ignites.
"For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter."--Gen. George Washington, Address to the Officers of the Army, Mar. 15, 1783
G
gle
gle
"Editorial Law
4 October 1933
The Reich Government has resolved upon the following law, which is hereby published:
Part One
The Editorial Profession
Section 1
The cooperative work carried on as main employment or based upon appointment to the position of chief editor in the shaping of the intellectual contents by written word, dissemination of news or pictures of the newspapers or political periodicals, which are published within the area of the Reich, is a public task, which is regulated as to its professional duties and rights by the state through this law. Its bearers are called editors. Nobody may call himself an editor who is not entitled to do so, according to this law.
Section 2
(1) Newspapers and periodicals are printed matters which appear in regular sequence at intervals of at most 3 months, without limiting their circulation to a certain group of persons.
(2) All reproductions of writings or illustrations, destined for dissemination, which are produced by means of a mass reproduction process are to be considered as printed matter.
Section 3
(1) The provisions of this law relating to newspapers are valid also for political periodicals.
(2) This law does not apply to newspapers and periodicals which are published by official order.
(3) The Reich Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda will determine which periodicals are to be considered as political within the meaning of the law. In case the periodical affects a certain vocational field, he will make the decision in agreement with the highest Reich or State agency concerned."--1933 REICHSGESETZBLATT (Reich Gazette Law)
4 October 1933
The Reich Government has resolved upon the following law, which is hereby published:
Part One
The Editorial Profession
Section 1
The cooperative work carried on as main employment or based upon appointment to the position of chief editor in the shaping of the intellectual contents by written word, dissemination of news or pictures of the newspapers or political periodicals, which are published within the area of the Reich, is a public task, which is regulated as to its professional duties and rights by the state through this law. Its bearers are called editors. Nobody may call himself an editor who is not entitled to do so, according to this law.
Section 2
(1) Newspapers and periodicals are printed matters which appear in regular sequence at intervals of at most 3 months, without limiting their circulation to a certain group of persons.
(2) All reproductions of writings or illustrations, destined for dissemination, which are produced by means of a mass reproduction process are to be considered as printed matter.
Section 3
(1) The provisions of this law relating to newspapers are valid also for political periodicals.
(2) This law does not apply to newspapers and periodicals which are published by official order.
(3) The Reich Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda will determine which periodicals are to be considered as political within the meaning of the law. In case the periodical affects a certain vocational field, he will make the decision in agreement with the highest Reich or State agency concerned."--1933 REICHSGESETZBLATT (Reich Gazette Law)
Or as Google calls the position, The Reich Minister for Diversity, Integrity, Governance,
Public Enlightenment and Propaganda:
Muzzled Much?
 |
| It's Always the Same: "Shuddup," they explained. |
Powerline's Scott Johnson: Almost blacklisted by Google
"In a message addressed to us along with Drudge Report, American Thinker, InstaPundit, PJ Media and Gateway Pundit, Leo Goldstein writes:
Why is Google in the Speech Suppression Business?
In honor of the September 11 commemoration, I wasn't going to post anything else today. But this Neo-Corporate book-burning needs to be exposed, on today of all days.
At what temperature does an idea burn, Google?
Like the man said: Conservatives Must Regulate Google And All of Silicon Valley Into Submission
Dear Editors,All I can say at this point is that we are in good company.".......
You might be interested to learn, that your websites have been almost blacklisted by Google. “Almost blacklisted” means that Google search artificially downranks results from your websites to such extent that you lose 55% – 75% of possible visitors traffic from Google. This sitution is probably aggravated by secondary effects, because many users and webmasters see Google ranking as a signal of trust.
This result is reported in my paper published in WUWT. The findings are consistent with multiple prior results, showing Google left/liberal bias, and pro-Hillary skew of Google search in the elections.
I write to all of them to give you opportunity to discuss this matter among yourselves. Even if Google owes nothing to your publications, it certainly owes good faith to the users of its search.
Intentionally hiding conservative and/or libertarian websites from the customers is an obvious breach of good faith.
Those of you who do not know me are welcome to visit at Climate Realism Against Alarmism.
The almost blacklisted domains:americanthinker.com
drudgereport.com
powerlineblog.com
pjmedia.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Best regards,
Leo Goldstein, DefyCCC.com
Why is Google in the Speech Suppression Business?
At what temperature does an idea burn, Google?
 |
| "I hate Silicon Nazis!" |
No comments:
Post a Comment