"Tina Peters’ case was an effort to portray her as a terrible criminal. This was not true. Tina had never been arrested before and was doing her job as the Mesa County Clerk in early 2021 by saving records of a recent election according to the law.
But when Tina reported on anomalies and differences identified in results before and after an election system upgrade in her county, all hell broke loose. Tina was vilified and shamed and indicted, arrested, and imprisoned.
In her trial, the judge (Judge Barrett) made flawed statements in his efforts to imprison Peters. He shared:
“You are a charlatan and you cannot help but lie as easy as it is for you to breathe. You betrayed your oath for no one other than you. And this is what makes Mrs. Peters such a danger to our community. It’s the position she held that has provided her the pulpit from which she can preach these lies, the undermining of our democratic process, the undermining of the belief and confidence in our election systems.These comments showed the bias coming from the judge. He was after the gold star mother and courageous woman who was just doing her job.
So the damage that is caused and continues to be caused is just as bad, if not worse, than the physical violence that this court sees on an all too regular basis. And it’s particularly damaging when those words come from someone who holds a position of influence like you. Every effort to undermine the integrity of our elections and the public’s trust in our institutions has been made by you. You’ve done it from that lectern. The voting public provided you with everything you’ve done has been to retain control influence. The damage is immeasurable. And every time it gets refuted, every time it’s shown to be false, just another tale is weaved.”
In a fair debate, we could easily pick apart ALL the statements above from Judge Barrett as being LIES based upon unfounded assumptions. This all leads to the court hearing yesterday in Colorado.
This was Judge Varholak’s court. He appeared very focused during her hearing on whether or not Tina’s speech was dangerous enough induce violence.
Judge Barrett claimed that her speech was “just as bad, if not worse than the physical violence his court sees on an all too regular basis”, yet he offered ZERO substantiation for that claim. Additionally, history has shown that ZERO violence EVER resulted from the information put forth from Tina Peters. Her entire history is all contained on her website https://tinapeters.us/.
Too bad for the prosecution that Tina’s disclosures occurred after Jan 6, 2021, because they would have likely blamed that violence on her (which the Deep State orchestrated via paid provocateurs–but that’s a whole other story). There’s NOTHING in any way, shape of form that resembles ANY type of violent response.
While Judge Varholak didn’t allow the Venezuelan Testimony from the actual programmers who claimed to write the software to cheat in our elections as a result of yesterday’s hearing, ironically at the same time MORE VENEZUELAN ELECTION MACHINE MALFEASANCE WAS JUST EXPOSED.
So, it looks like that perhaps within a week we will hear his ruling on whether Tina Peters was wrongly incarcerated for exercising her right to free speech. Also, keep in mind, one’s exercise of free speech doesn’t depend upon whether the person exercising that right is telling the truth or not. If it did, practically all MSM would be in serious trouble.
ALL that matters is whether or not free speech is dangerous in the form of fomenting physical violence/yelling fire in a theatre etc. It will be interesting to see whether anything can be pulled out of a hat to claim that Tina did incite violence/yelled fire in a theatre.
We will see if Judge Varholak sees Tina as the same risk that Judge Barrett claimed to see. This is what is on the table. There were indications that Judge Varholak may see things differently than Judge Barrett." .......
President Trump sent his own lawyer and friend Peter Ticktin to free Tina.
Her claim is based on Cabal Judge Matthew Barrett's own words. He ruled that her Free Speech claims of Election Fraud were so dangerous to Our Precious Democracy(tm) that she must remain in her CIA Rendition Site forever.
Nevermind that Bush was Selected Not Elected(tm). Nevermind that Trump was Installed by Putin(tm). Democrats can claim election fraud for years and years without hurting Democracy, but not Tina Peters.
We should take all the Stolen Election laws off the books if it is a crime to assert it.
It is not a Crime to disagree with the Gubberment. "Dangerous" is how these tyrants censor and jail dissidents, whether its Stolen Elections, Poison Vaxx or chopping off children's sex organs.
btw, Ticktin says Bondi's Number 2- man Todd Blanche is thwarting PDT's legal agenda, and he would know.
“Your DOJ: Pam Bondi works remotely from Florida, flies up for announcements. Todd Blanche runs Pam’s DOJ, was a Dem until Jan 2025, and has blocked: Tina’s release, Investigation into Dominion, Restitution for J6 political prisoners & Pardons Trump wants done.” ……..
LindellTV on X: w/ Emerald:
“Todd Blanche is blocking Trump’s agenda at DOJ.”
On Emerald’s Peter Ticktin, former attorney for President Trump, breaks his silence, accusing President Trump’s current legal advisor Todd Blanche of intentionally stalling pardons, blocking access to whistleblowers, and whistleblowers, and suppressing justice for J6ers and election integrity fighters like Tina Peters.
“Everything that needs to move forward for Trump’s presidency is being intentionally blocked by Todd Blanche… and it’s not because he’s incapable. It’s because he’s doing the opposite of what President Trump ordered.”.......
We speak this OUT LOUD:
By the Authority of the Believer, we decree downfall, defeat and disappearance for all wicked spirits of Cabal Tyranny, schemes and personnel. We decree Vindication and Freedom for Tina Peters and this Covenant Nation, in the Name of our King Jesus, Yes and Amen!Acts 12
5 So Peter was kept in prison, but the church was earnestly praying to God for him.
6 The night before Herod was to bring him to trial, Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains, and sentries stood guard at the entrance. 7 Suddenly an angel of the Lord appeared and a light shone in the cell. He struck Peter on the side and woke him up. “Quick, get up!” he said, and the chains fell off Peter’s wrists.
Suddenly, Lord!
No comments:
Post a Comment