And you might just be a member
Better get out of Denver
Better get out of Denver"--Bob Seger
If Joe McCarthy got specific cases wrong, he got the Big Picture a thousand percent right. History has vindicated him on the Communist Take-over of the Permanent Government.
They've finally gone full-Communist--although none of the old labels quite fit anymore.
None of the old labels quite fit because it is a toxic stew of every malign "ism" of recorded History. From feudalism to Globalism, child sacrifice, dirt-worship, perversion, mad science, totalitarianism, Babel-ism, Islamism, corporatism, gangsterism, warlord-ism, and every shade of Communism to include Nazism and Fascism--a useful term to accentuate the Corporate/State Incest we see today. And then some.
All of the “isms” that is–and some that ism’t.
But for our purposes, we'll call it Communism. Because "Obamunism" is too accurate.
 |
| Sure he can. And then some. |
We’ve reached Full Inversion. Now Communists on the Reichstag Committee point to the map like Sen. McCarthy once did, only this time, to point out the enemy strongholds where patriotic Americans live.
And that’s a LOT of places. We’re the Real Majority. That’s why we won the last elections in landslides, only to have them stolen.
Remember: Stealing elections, rule-by-decree, censorship, all this Police State Gestapo-ism–those are all signs of weakness. If their ideas were popular, there would be no need for any of that. They would simply win elections honestly.
But they can’t. They are stupid, brutal, corrupt and dying dinosaurs who see an asteroid hurtling to earth and comprehend nothing.
 |
| Commusaurus Obammunus |
Mr. SMITH: And is it your opinion that that strike was instituted by members of the Communist Party to serve their purposes?
Mr. DISNEY: Well, it proved itself so with time, and I definitely feel it was a Communist group trying to take over my artists and they did take them over.
The CHAIRMAN: Do you say they did take them over?
Mr. DISNEY: They did take them over.
Mr. SMITH: Will you explain that to the committee, please?
Mr. DISNEY: It came to my attention when a delegation of my boys, my artists, came to me and told me that Mr. Herbert Sorrell—
Mr. SMITH: Is that Herbert K. Sorrell?
Mr. DISNEY: Herbert K. Sorrell, was trying to take them over. I explained to them that it was none of my concern, that I had been cautioned to not even talk with any of my boys on labor. They said it was not a matter of labor, it was just a matter of them not wanting to go with Sorrell, and they had heard that I was going to sign with Sorrell, and they said that they wanted an election to prove that Sorrell didn’t have the majority, and I said that I had a right to demand an election. So when Sorrell came I demanded an election.
Sorrell wanted me to sign on a bunch of cards that he had there that he claimed were the majority, but the other side had claimed the same thing. I told Mr. Sorrell that there is only one way for me to go and that was an election and that is what the law had set up, the National Labor Relations Board was for that purpose. He laughed at me and he said that he would use the Labor Board as it suited his purposes and that he had been sucker enough to go for that Labor Board ballot and he had lost some election—I can’t remember the name of the place—by one vote. He said it took him 2 years to get it back. He said he would strike, that that was his weapon. He said, “I have all of the tools of the trade sharpened,” that I couldn’t stand the ridicule or the smear of a strike. I told him that it was a matter of principle with me, that I couldn’t go on working with my boys feeling that I had sold them down the river to him on his say-so, and he laughed at me and told me I was naive and foolish. He said, you can’t stand this strike, I will smear you, and I will make a dust bowl out of your plant.
The CHAIRMAN: What was that?
Mr. DISNEY: He said he would make a dust bowl out of my plant if he chose to. I told him I would have to go that way, sorry, that he might be able to do all that, but I would have to stand on that. The result was that he struck.
I believed at that time that Mr. Sorrell was a Communist because of all the things that I had heard and having seen his name appearing on a number of Commie front things. When he pulled the strike the first people to smear me and put me on the unfair list were all of the Commie front organizations. I can’t remember them all, they change so often, but one that is clear in my mind is the League of Women Shoppers, The People’s World, The Daily Worker, and the PM magazine in New York. They smeared me. Nobody came near to find out what the true facts of the thing were. And I even went through the same smear in South America, through some Commie periodicals in South America, and generally throughout the world all of the Commie groups began smear campaigns against me and my pictures.
Mr. MCDOWELL: In what fashion was that smear, Mr. Disney, what type of smear?
Mr. DISNEY: Well, they distorted everything, they lied; there was no way you could ever counteract anything that they did; they formed picket lines in front of the theaters, and, well, they called my plant a sweat-shop, and that is not true, and anybody in Hollywood would prove it otherwise. They claimed things that were not true at all and there was no way you could fight it back. It was not a labor problem at all because—I mean, I have never had labor trouble, and I think that would be backed up by anybody in Hollywood. ...
Mr. SMITH: Do you recall having had any conversations with Mr. Sorrell relative to communism?
Mr. DISNEY: Yes, I do.
Mr. SMITH: Will you relate that conversation?
Mr. DISNEY: Well, I didn’t pull my punches on how I felt. He evidently heard that I had called them all a bunch of Communists—and I believe they are. At the meeting he leaned over and he said, “You think I am a Communist, don’t you,” and I told him that all I knew was what I heard and what I had seen, and he laughed and said, “Well, I used their money to finance my strike of 1937,”
"Disney has removed an episode of the long-running animated series The Simpsons from its streaming platform in Hong Kong due to the episode mocking Chinese censorship... Up until recently, every episode of the 32-year-old show was available on Disney’s exclusive streaming platform, Disney+. However, users in Hong Kong have since noted that an episode released in 2005, “Goo Goo Gai Pan,” no longer shows up on the platform. The episode features the titular family visiting Tiananmen Square, and pokes fun at the Chinese government’s censorship with a plaque at the scene that simply reads “On this site in 1989, nothing happened.” The incident reflects China’s growing stranglehold on the American entertainment industry, and particularly Disney. The company has come under fire in recent years for numerous acts of pandering to the Chinese government, even going so far as to defend its human rights violations. Last year’s live-action remake of Mulan was filmed in parts of the Xinjiang region, which is notorious for being the location of numerous concentration camps for Uyghur Muslims. The lead actress in the film, Liu Yifie, faced backlash after openly voicing her support for the Hong Kong police beating pro-democracy protesters in the streets; despite calls to boycott the film and her career, she did not apologize for her comments. ...Disney has frequently edited its movie posters for use in China, often for the purpose of removing any prominent black actors, such as the poster for the 2015 “Star Wars” reboot, The Force Awakens. Meanwhile, back in the United States, Disney has openly supported the violent and racist Black Lives Matter movement, with Disney donating up to $5 million to various “social justice” groups..."....... |
| "If I were alive today, I'd burn the motherfucker down." |
"Biden’s inauguration marks the hegemony of an American oligarchy that sees its relationship with China as a shield and sword against their own countrymen. Like Athens’ Thirty Tyrants, they are not simply contemptuous of a political system that recognizes the natural rights of all its citizens that are endowed by our Creator; they despise in particular the notion that those they rule have the same rights they do. Witness their newfound respect for the idea that speech should only be free for the enlightened few who know how to use it properly. Like Critias and the pro-Sparta faction, the new American oligarchy believes that democracy’s failures are proof of their own exclusive right to power—and they are happy to rule in partnership with a foreign power that will help them destroy their own countrymen.Read it all. The Thirty Tyrants - Tablet Magazine
What does history teach us about this moment? The bad news is that the Thirty Tyrants exiled notable Athenian democrats and confiscated their property while murdering an estimated 5% of the Athenian population.
The good news is that their rule lasted less than a year.".......
“Joe, you will empty your Strategic Petroleum Reserve at once. It offends me.”
“Yes, Mr. President. And could I also name an aircraft carrier after you, sir?”
“That won’t be necessary, Joe. Especially after you drain the Reserve. Besides, I thought I might name one after you.”
"I'm honored, sir."
"Not really."
DC Democrats Claim Victory Over Inflation With Temporary Two Cent Drop in Gasoline Prices - Their Emphasis Explains Why They Need Omicron - The Last Refuge
"Energy inflation overall, and gasoline inflation specifically, is the Build Back Better communists’ Achilles heel. The Biden administration is ideologically committed to climate change policy and as a result they have no supply-side tools to stop gasoline prices from necessarily skyrocketing. They desperately need the fear of Omicron to shut down the demand side. Knuckleheads…. All communists are knuckleheads."
There's a Hole in the Minds of Democrats - Gold Goats 'n Guns (tomluongo.me)
"Democrats don’t stand for anything but rather are simply another victims support group.
That’s where the hole in their minds resides, when you then try to stand for something, in this case global communism run by Eurocrats from Brussels, you have no clear messaging as to what you want to achieve, other than, “burn the heretics at the stake!”. And that doesn’t really play well without looking completely insane to everyone who isn’t a “purple-haired cat lady on a cocktail of antidepressants ranting about white supremacy.”
And because of that it creates a hole not only in strategy but in conception. They have a massive blind spot thinking that the rules they’ve always known are still in place.
Pelosi only sees this in terms of her own biases — hating Republicans, besting tyrannical men, being top dog, slitting throats, etc. She’s not seeing nor caring about the bigger picture, this is all about winning the political battle because that’s all she knows.
Schumer has become a laughingstock not only within his own party but in general. He’s been exposed as such a shill for internationalist and intelligence agency forces within our government that he hasn’t sat down on a chair without a hole in it for years, lest he break the hand stuck up his ass making him speak.
Mitch McConnell has outplayed both of them in every conceivable way.
The Progressives thought they had this locked up because DNC leadership was given their marching orders from Davos which was their agenda all along. All each group had to do was virtue signal to their aggrieved supporters and the two factions would Straussian Two-Step (Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis) their way to victory.
The main problem with this is that the Democrats were arguing against themselves and forgetting about what the rest of the country actually thought about this.
It’s like they are daring us to stop them shooting themselves in the head. And this torture won’t stop until we get to the debt ceiling drop dead date in December.
And that manifested itself as two people, Manchin and Sinema, who stood up and said, “You’ve got to be fucking kidding me!” These bills are not only unnecessary but they are designed to ensure 1) no Democrats in swing states/districts gets elected ever again and 2) sells the country out for an agenda that is clearly not in any American’s best interest.
You can’t run a government solely on ideological blindness, bullying and Kompromat. If you do you get what’s going on today on Capitol Hill.".......
Logocide | The Z Blog (thezman.com):
"Fidel Castro would give speeches that lasted half a day. Stalin would deliver long harangues to the Party Congress for no other reason than to fill the room with words.
In America, this started to creep in after the Cold War. Bill Clinton would give long speeches that were cognitively meaningless. The word “emote” came into common usage at this time as his speeches were like the “feelies” in the Huxley novel Brave New World. They were not intended to stimulate your mind, but rather to anesthetize it so you could experience the raw emotion being conveyed. His most memorable words are those from his rare confessions of guilt.
Obama took it further by delivering nonsense speeches that were not just devoid of meaning, but an assault on the concept of meaning. His language was an assault on the mind, an effort to destroy reason. Instead, the listener was supposed to abandon his senses and float along on the warm thermals of passive happiness. His fans swore he was a great speaker, but they never quoted him. To quote the great man would invite questioning the great man and that was not permitted.
Authoritarian systems use language to suffocate and stifle the mind, because people thinking independently is always a danger. The point of regime language is to strip language of its meaning. Demagogic language makes the people incapable of the objectivity and perspective that leads to questioning. Questioning naturally leads to the formation of individual ideas. Regime language seeks to destroy the independent mind by stripping the language of meaning.
One result of this is some people become parrots, repeating slogans and catchwords without understanding what they mean. These people are so fearful of any deviation from the prescribed opinions, they only use the terms provided by the regime. It is a ritualized self-degradation. To express and judge all opinions in the accepted clichés and phrasing of the regime is to accept that words and the concepts behind them have no independent meaning.
It is logocide, the deliberate killing of words in order to kill the concepts that lie behind those words. The most obvious example is “fascist”, which no longer has a cognitive meaning in modern society. It exists only to trigger an emotional response tuned to meet the needs of the regime. The structure of modern Western government is about as close to fascism as we have come since the middle of the last century, but the word itself now means anyone who opposes the regime.".......
"I hold in my hands a list of all the ANTIFA agent provocateurs that Nancy and I used to overthrow Trump on Jan. 6th. But you can't see it."
No comments:
Post a Comment