Friday, February 23, 2018

Gunning for Control: The Conspiracy Theorized

“Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: 'Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action.'"--Auric Husseinfinger


I never really bought into conspiracy theories.

Talk of the Tri-Lateral Commission, Bilderburgers with Fries or Dick Cheney scaling the Twin Towers like Spiderman to plant bombs all make my eyes glaze over like melting steel.

But Parkland stinks.

Las Vegas stinks.

Charlottesville stinks.

And Fast and Furious stinks.

Not to mention the shooters at Ft. Hood, the Orlando nightclub, the Boston Marathon and Garland, Texas were all known to the FBI. And just like this shooter, all were allowed to operate with impunity.

I don't mean to go all Mel Gibsonish "Conspiracy Theory" on you, Sugartits, but this is all starting to look and smell like one big project to gut the Second Amendment and disarm the American people. 
...or did they fail for other reasons?
We know for a fact that Fast and Furious was an anti-gun, anti-NRA Black Op that boomeranged on the Obama Justice Department (as did Obama Justice Department's Sanctuary School program at Parkland).

We also know for a fact that the Obama/Clinton Deep State just tried to criminally rig the last election. That's a conspiracy of monumental proportion, even if the News Molesters are dedicated to burying the story.

Are we supposed to think that they would attempt a coup--but that's where they draw the line; they would never stage or allow an agit-prop event in which people, especially students, got killed? Newsflash: that's exactly what the Bill Ayers-gang did at Kent State.

Fast and Furious was designed to institute Gun Control.  It got Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry killed. When el Chapo was finally caught, he still had a Holder .50 caliber machine gun. Why wouldn't they continue to create other scenarios for anti-gun agitation? Because they're too principled? Please. They have proven that Power is their only Principle.

Ohr's involved again. Brennan is agitating again. Barry just told young activists "We've been waiting for you." I'll bet you have. Has there ever been a Communist coup-plotter who didn't want to disarm the general public?

Call me crazy if you want. Paranoid. Partisan. I don't care. I never thought I'd see our Media go full-Pravda. And I really never would have believed that I would see the day when the entire National Security Apparatus would wiretap and attempt to frame a presidential candidate.

But it happened.

Ronald Reagan once said "Don't be afraid to see what you see." He faced down the Hollywood Communists in his own neighborhood, and then around the world. Then, as now, lot of people were invested in hiding the truth. But he saw it clearly.

Pres. Reagan: "I know of no leader of the Soviet Union since the revolution, and including the present leadership, that has not more than once repeated in the various Communist congresses they hold their determination that their goal must be the promotion of world revolution and a one-world Socialist or Communist state, whichever word you want to use. ...They...have openly and publicly declared that the only morality they recognize is what will further their cause, meaning they reserve unto themselves the right to commit any crime, to lie, to cheat, in order to attain that, and that is moral, not immoral, and we operate on a different set of standards..."

But even Reagan couldn't have known that we would install a crypto-Communist, an Islamuninist, if you will, in the Oval Office in 2008. 
Now it's our turn to "see what we see."

No comments:

Post a Comment