 |
| "There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice."--Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws |
According to Homeland Security, opposition to COVID measures, claims of election fraud, belief that the True President can be reinstated, the 9/11 anniversary and religious holidays are the hallmarks of a terrorist now.
I'm old enough to remember when the People used to tell the Government what to think, not vice versa.
Opposition to lockdowns and the masking of children is a majority opinion. And whether majority or minority, it is one that we as Americans are entitled to hold with being labeled by an out-of-control government.
Even Dr. Franken-Fauci has dissented from himself more times than a schizophrenic stutterer--and he invented the virus. If you want to lock him up, though, I'll understand.
Top scientists, eminent doctors, prize-winning inventors, leading vaccinologists and millions of doctors and nurses all disagree with aspects of the Official Narrative(tm) on bloodletting COVID.
What about the thousands maimed and deceased victims of the vaccine listed on the VAERS system? Presumably, they and their loved ones oppose the vaccine that killed or wounded them. Are they terrorists for getting sick and dying? Are they Enemies of the State? How dare they get paralyzed! An enlarged heart? Really? Don't they know we have vaccines to sell?
At least they'll be easy to chase down, I suppose.
When did Americans lose the Right to seek a second medical opinion? Couldn't you just pretend we're Taliban, Politburo members or illegal aliens with COVID and let us do what we want?
Election fraud is the majority opinion in this country. And since he won in a runaway landslide, so is support for Actual President Trump. Even millions of Biden supporters think he could be reinstated. After all, he is the True President. Are they honorary terrorists, too?
And if it is terroristic to even allege it, shouldn't we remove our Election Fraud laws from the books? How do you prosecute fraud when it cannot even be spoken?
In 2018, half the Democrats in DC said Dominion CheatWare was a dangerous threat to Honest Elections. And 100% of them said Donald Trump stole the 2016 election with Putin's help. Did Homeland call them "Potential Terror Threats"? I must have missed it. And I was paying attention.
And “Religious holidays”? You mean like Easter? Purim? Rumspringa? If you mean Ramadan, say so. Without consulting any polls, I'm going to say support for Christmas is a majority position, too.
The m-RNA Regime is saying it's political opponents and everyday America is a hostile nation of terrorists and terrorist-sympathizers.
But, then, all Occupation Governments say that, don’t they?
| August Landmesser refuses to do the "Sieg Heil" salute during a Nazi rally at the Blohm & Voss shipyard Hamburg, June 13, |
"This is quite a remarkable development and seems to underpin the tenuous, unstable and fragile disposition of the current regime. The Department of Homeland Security seems rather paranoid in their need to label anyone who would question the COVID-19 response. More than half the country would now be defined as dissidents and domestic terrorists within their our homeland. Think about that.
DHS – The Secretary of Homeland Security has issued a new National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin regarding the current heightened threat environment across the United States. […] These threats include those posed by domestic terrorists, individuals and groups engaged in grievance-based violence. […] Such threats are also exacerbated by impacts of the ongoing global pandemic, including grievances over public health safety measures and perceived government restrictions. (read more)
Notice the wording of that introduction. The government imposed mandates, mask and vaccination requirements are only “perceived government restrictions.” The chains that bind your expressions of liberty and freedom are merely figments of your imagination. The rules and denials of activity that we are forced to live by, under the auspices of “public health and safety measures“, are only perceived demands.
The needle being forced into the arm of federal workers by the Federal Government is only the perception of a forced medical treatment, your perception of what they are doing is the problem. You must correct your wrong-thoughts to eliminate the wrong perception. Dear leader appreciates your compliance.
Comrade dissidents, that statement is full blown Stazi-level propaganda.
After Barack H Obama was successfully installed in office, something began to shift. While the U.S. media had always been biased, manipulative and dishonest, there was something more that changed after the installation of The One, The Lightbringer…
The shift coincided with the merge between the intelligence apparatus and the new platforms of social media. The speed of the shift aligned with the speed of technology that was driving communication.
Together the intelligence apparatus, the customary U.S. media and Big Tech began testing how far and how fast they could control the outlook of Americans. Few people were paying attention to it…. there were some… but not many, and most of those who did notice were not connecting the dots to the actual tests.
The shift in attack direction from media (social and traditional) at the time was alarming. No longer was the media trying to excuse or justify the transparently guilty of accountability; starting around 2011 & 2012, what the new-era attack started to do was falsely accuse the transparently innocent.
Read that again, because it was a profound difference; and inflection point.
[Transparently innocent: George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson, the Baltimore Six,… then ultimately, Donald J Trump]
Now, fast forward through the next decade and what does this current DHS terrorism bulletin do? It expands the targeting of the transparently innocent.".......
They were trying to manufacture a White Supremacist boogeyman out of thin air and get President Trump to endorse them. It was the Intelligence Community's Agit-Prop wrap-up smear, a Black Op against the twice duly-elected President.
Did you ever notice how no real QAnons got arrested–and Buffalo Horns doesn’t even count.
QAnon is essentially Chris Wray blogging in Dick Durbin’s basement while wearing a pair of John Brennan’s borrowed underwear.
To the Congress of the United States:
"Throughout our history as a Nation, our people have always--and properly--been wary of government action which limited personal liberty. At the time our Constitution was being debated, there was considerable fear that it did not properly safeguard the exercise of individual freedom. As a result, the first ten amendments to the Constitution--the Bill of Rights--were adopted, in order to make sure that the Federal Government would not infringe upon the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the fight of peaceable assembly, and the other basic rights which are essential in a free society. The Bill of Rights was then, and remains today, a stirring embodiment of our democratic ideals--an inspiration to free men everywhere and to those who would be free.
... It is clear that on certain occasions, that line has been over-stepped.
Soon after our Government began functioning under the Constitution, there was enacted, in 1798, the group of legislative acts known as the Alien and Sedition Laws. These laws were ostensibly designed to prevent activities which would undermine the Nation's safety and independence. But in fact they were broad enough--and were used--to imprison many leading citizens, including a Member of Congress, who expressed disagreement with the policies of the Administration then in office.
The Alien and Sedition Laws were so repugnant to the free spirit of our people that they played an important part in the disappearance of the Federalist Party, which sponsored them, and the objectionable features of these laws were shortly repealed or allowed to expire. That experience taught us a great lesson: that extreme and arbitrary security measures strike at the very heart of our free society, and that we must be eternally vigilant against those who would undermine freedom in the name of security.
Since the time of the Alien and Sedition Laws, there have been recurrent periods-especially in wartime-when the safety of our Nation has been in danger. Each of these occasions has confronted us with a new set of conditions, to which we have had to adjust our internal security laws and procedures.
At the same time, each of these periods of danger has been seized on by those who, in good faith or bad, would severely limit the freedom of our people in a misguided attempt to gain greater security. As we look back now, we can see that there have been certain times when we have, to some extent, repudiated our own ideals of freedom in an excess of zeal for our safety. Nevertheless, it is a tribute to the strong faith and common sense of our people that we have never for long been misled by the hysterical cries of those who would suppress our Constitutional freedoms.......There are some people who wish us to enact laws which would seriously damage the right of free speech and which could be used not only against subversive groups but against other groups engaged in political or other activities which were not generally popular. Such measures would not only infringe on the Bill of Rights and the basic liberties of our people; they would also undermine the very internal security they seek to protect.
Laws forbidding dissent do not prevent subversive activities; they merely drive them into more secret and more dangerous channels. Police states are not secure; their history is marked by successive purges, and growing concentration camps, as their governments strike out blindly in fear of violent revolt. Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.
We must, therefore, be on our guard against extremists who urge us to adopt police state measures. Such persons advocate breaking down the guarantees of the Bill of Rights in order to get at the [enemy]. They forget that if the Bill of Rights were to be broken down, all groups...would be in danger from the arbitrary power of government.
This kind of proposed legislation is dangerous because, in attempting to proscribe, for groups, certain activities that are perfectly proper for everyone else, such legislation would spread a legal dragnet sufficiently broad to permit the prosecution of people who are entirely innocent or merely misguided. ...
We must not be swept away by a wave of hysteria.
This propaganda is a formidable threat to the unity of the free nations in working for peace. The best answer to it is not words, but deeds. We must demonstrate that we are a country in which men can live together and advance together as a free society. This alone can prove the falseness of the communist attack. It would be tragic in the highest degree if we were to frighten ourselves into destroying those very liberties which are the basis of our moral leadership in the struggle for peace.
I am determined that the United States shall be secure. I am equally determined that we shall keep our historic liberties."
HARRY S. TRUMAN, ACTUAL PRESIDENT
 |
| "...Whatever It Takes." |
No comments:
Post a Comment