“The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone. This will lay all things at their feet, and they are too well versed in English law to forget the maxim, ‘boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem’ [good judges have ample jurisdiction]. . . . A judiciary independent of a king or executive alone, is a good thing; but independence of the will of the nation is a solecism, at least in a republican government.”--Real President Thomas Jefferson, (Letter to Thomas Ritchie, Dec. 25, 1820)
“…The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”--Actual President Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address
Chilling info on Jamie Raskin's wife might explain why he's fighting DOGE... - Revolver News:
"You might remember Jamie’s latest stunt—suing the federal government because DOGE is exposing the lies, corruption, and reckless spending of US tax dollars. According to Raskin, the American people are somehow being bamboozled by DOGE, rather than by the real bad guys—our elected and unelected officials, who have been lying and scheming for years.
The kicker is that Congressman Raskin failed to disclose certain financials from his darling wife in a timely manner, violating the Stock Act in the process. But that’s not even the worst of it…
Jamie Raskin’s wife previously served at the top levels of the treasury and the federal reserve during the Obama administration.
Raskin took eight months to disclose his wife’s sale of 195,936 shares of Reserve Trust, where she sat on the advisory board. This sale resulted in $1.5 million in profit for Raskin’s wife.
This was a violation of the Stock Act.
But that’s not the real story, the real stories is that in 2018, when she sat on the advisory board, the Fed granted Reserve Trust unusual access to its master account — an enviable get that allows the fintech company to move money for customers without relying on banks.
This was the only state chartered trust company in the country to get one.
And that’s why she got 1.5 million dollars in exchange.
You see why @RepRaskin is terrified of @elonmusk and DOGE auditing the treasury." .......
And speaking of, if all of this wasn’t bad enough, we’re also finding out that Jamie’s wife was the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury who unmasked General Flynn." .......
Ousted From Power By Voters, Dems Turn To Activist Judges To Defy Trump:
"All Democrats have to do is shop for a venue to find the most activist, rabidly anti-Trump federal judges in the country, file their lawsuits, and wait for the injunctions to come raining down.
By doing this, Democrats and their allies in the judiciary turn the Constitution on its head, and effectively govern negatively through injunction, making major reform of the federal bureaucracy impossible. In nearly every case so far, the federal judiciary is siding with the permanent bureaucracy in Washington, preventing the Trump administration from doing anything to reform it despite Trump having campaigned on precisely that promise.
The problem is, as my colleague Sean Davis noted recently on X, federal judges have no actual authority to do this. They can’t decide on their own who the president can talk to or what data he can access. They can’t bind the president at all. According to the U.S. Constitution they’re “inferior” courts and therefore don’t have any authority over the executive branch. Yes, the three branches of the federal government are coequal, but the only part of the federal judiciary that’s equal to the presidency is the Supreme Court, not all the federal district courts scattered across the country.
“John Roberts and SCOTUS have two options here: they can bring these inferior malcontents to heel, or they can get used to the President simply ignoring these inferior courts or Congress eliminating them entirely,” wrote Davis. “Congress created these inferior courts so the Supreme Court wouldn’t have to deal with every federal case by itself. But if these rogue inferior judges are going to routinely issue lawless decisions that the Supreme Court has to deal with anyway, Congress would be well within its rights to just eliminate them.”
The issue might come to a head before Congress gets around to eliminating the federal courts, though. If the Supreme Court steps in on just one of these cases where a federal judge has blocked a lawful executive order from Trump, it might not go well for Democrats. In the 2018 Supreme Court case Trump v. Hawaii, which reversed a lower court’s decision to uphold a nationwide injunction on Trump’s travel ban, Justice Clarence Thomas called into question the idea that a federal judge in Hawaii (or anywhere else) can simply issue an injunction against a presidential executive order and apply it to the entire country.
“District courts, including the one here, have begun imposing universal injunctions without considering their authority to grant such sweeping relief,” wrote Thomas. “These injunctions are beginning to take a toll on the federal court system — preventing legal questions from percolating through the federal courts, encouraging forum shopping, and making every case a national emergency for the courts and for the Executive Branch.”
He went on to say he is “skeptical that district courts have the authority to enter universal injunctions,” that such injunctions didn’t emerge until a century and a half after the Founding, and that they “appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality.”" .......
Justice Thomas Takes Aim At Insane Tactic Of Nationwide Injunctions
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Bid to Restrict Birthright Citizenship – Breitbart
Judge Blocks Elon Musk, DOGE, Access to Treasury Department Data
Judge Blocks Donald Trump’s H-1B Reforms
Judge to Consider Restricting Musk Team’s Access to Education Dept. Data – The New York Times
Federal judge expands block on Trump administration effort to cut public health funding
Judge finds Trump administration violated court order halting funding freeze
Judge says he will continue to pause Trump’s federal buyout offer--UPDATE: WITHDRAWN
Second federal judge blocks Trump birthright citizenship order | Fox News
Judge orders fired head of whistleblower agency reinstated while fight continues over Trump removal
Third judge blocks Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship for children of people in U.S. illegally
Judge Rips Supreme Court Immunity Ruling in Records Case Related to Trump
Judge to consider order to keep DOGE from accessing student loan databases
Judge blocks Trump plan to put thousands of USAID staff on leave | AllSides
John Roberts must get off his compromised ass shortly today and crush this nonsense, some of which is not just un-Constitutional but a criminal Conspiracy to Obstruct investigations of Bribery, Kickbacks, Terrorism Funding, Regime Change Coups, Censorship and Virus-Building meant to murder Americans.
Maybe a statement like this would shake him loose:
“Because of the unprecedented assault on the Constitution by every communist Night Court Judge in America, my administration will not comply with any illegitimate rulings by lesser courts until the Supreme Court has ruled.
And maybe not even then.
We’ll see what happens.”
The Lawful Response is to defy this unlawful Anti-Law order, which was issued to Obstruct Justice and shield the Guilty.
But the Guilty will find no shield, in Jesus’ Name, Amen!
Isaiah 1
26 I will restore your judges as at the first,
and your counselors as at the beginning.
Afterward you shall be called
the city of righteousness,
a faithful town.27 Zion shall be redeemed with justice
and her converts with righteousness.
28 But the destruction of the transgressors and sinners shall be together,
and those who forsake the Lord shall be consumed.29 For they shall be ashamed of the oaks
which you have desired,
and you shall be humiliated for the gardens
that you have chosen.
30 For you shall be as an oak whose leaf fades,
and as a garden that has no water.
31 The strong shall be as tinder,
and his work like a spark;
they will both burn together,
and no one will quench them.
No comments:
Post a Comment