"THE PROBLEM WITH POPE LEO XIV" by Ayaan Hirsi Ali:
“A Pope who breaks bread with partisan operatives and emerges days later to attack a sitting president has ceased, in my mind, to function as a shepherd of souls.
He has become, instead, a political actor—and a graceless one at that. And this fits a recent pattern for the Vatican.
When Hamas butchered 1,200 Israelis on October 7th, the condemnation of Israel came readily from Pope Francis, while the slaughter and kidnappings passed without an explicit condemnation of Hamas.
Pope Leo has been conspicuously silent about the systematic persecution of Christians at the hands of Muslims in majority-Muslim countries.
This includes the burning of churches and the slaughter of Christian communities across northern Nigeria—along with forced conversions in Pakistan and disappearances in Egypt.
Each of these is a direct expression of a civilizational clash that Pope Leo refuses to name.
I have said this for more than twenty years. I have paid for saying it.
And I will say it again: the West is losing this war. Not on the battlefield, but in the cathedrals, the chanceries, and the press conferences of men who were elected to be shepherds and have chosen instead to be diplomats.
As I write this, Pope Leo is in Algeria bowing at the Great Mosque of Algiers, shoes removed, pen in hand at the Golden Book.
I do not begrudge Muslims their mosques. I object to the theology being performed in such gestures — the implicit suggestion, increasingly explicit in Vatican discourse, that the differences between Islam and Christianity are merely cultural and that interfaith harmony can be achieved by erasing doctrinal distinction.” .......
 |
Pope Alinsky.
The Trump Super-Power strikes again.
Glory!
He should get his act together - Fondazione EXSURGE DOMINE Ets--Archbishop Vigano:
"... Thus, a single phrase, extrapolated from its context – “I am not afraid of the Trump administration, nor of boldly proclaiming the message of the Gospel” – might appear entirely unobjectionable. Yet, when viewed within a broader, more coherent framework, it leaves one utterly perplexed, for it directly contradicts the very words Leo uttered on that same occasion: “We are not politicians. […] I do not believe that the message of the Gospel should be instrumentalized, as some are currently doing.” And while there are undoubtedly those who instrumentalize “the message of the Gospel” through the pseudo-messianic delusions typical of American televangelists, there are also most certainly those the within the Vatican who do not hesitate to instrumentalize that very same Gospel to lend a veneer of legitimacy and morality to the agenda of ethnic replacement and the Islamization of the West: an agenda doggedly pursued by the globalist elite through the Agenda 2030.
This is an Agenda that Trump detests entirely, but which the Holy See, Leo, the USCCB, and a host of pseudo-Catholic charities have elevated to the status of a new globalist totem within their own synodal program. Nor should we forget the doctrinal ratification that Bergoglio bestowed upon the pandemic farce and mass vaccination, just as he did for climate fraud and “sustainable development goals” with his pseudo-encyclical Laudato Si, or the blessing that Prevost imparted to a block of ice specially shipped from Antarctica during a truly cringeworthy ceremony at Castel Gandolfo.
Despite his insistence that he is not a politician, Leo had no qualms about granting a private audience on April 9 to David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s chief strategist and former senior advisor at the White House. One question is more than legitimate: Did Axelrod perhaps come to the Vatican to dictate a specific political strategy to Leo, much as Hillary Clinton and John Podesta had previously interfered to pressure Benedict XVI into abdicating and then facilitate the election of Bergoglio?
The paradox is made manifest by Trump himself: “Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a politician. It’s hurting him very badly and, more importantly, it’s hurting the Catholic Church!” Which is absolutely true, more so than President Trump could possibly imagine.
While the Democratic administrations have repeatedly and improperly interfered in the governance of the Church of Rome, untimely and inappropriate interventions by the Vatican regarding Washington have hardly been lacking either. And while nobody was surprised by the invective of the Jesuit from Buenos Aires, who labeled Trump “unchristian” for declaring his intention to repatriate hordes of illegal immigrants, the pronouncements of the Augustinian from Chicago regarding immigration, and more recently concerning the war, have certainly left observers bewildered: “God blesses no conflict. Anyone who is a disciple of Christ, the Prince of Peace, never sides with those who yesterday wielded the sword and today drop bombs,” Leo said. ... Leo could have recalled the words of Pius XII: “A people threatened by, or already the victim of, unjust aggression, if it wishes to act in a Christian manner, cannot remain in a state of passive indifference; moreover, the solidarity of the family of nations forbids others from behaving as mere spectators, adopting an attitude of impassive neutrality.”
But Prevost – and herein lies the true problem – does not speak with the voice of the Church: his words of condemnation against any war whatsoever ultimately serve to legitimize even unjust wars, thereby depriving the victim of aggression of the right to self-defense, given that even a defensive war would be deemed unjust. This error is akin to asserting that all religions are equivalent, that moral precepts must be adapted to contingent circumstances (see Amoris Lætitia and Fiducia Supplicans), or that capital punishment is contrary to the Gospel. For in these instances, too, the one who ought to serve as a point of reference in discerning Good from Evil betrays his own mandate by granting equal rights to error and to Truth, rather than assuming his moral responsibility to condemn the former and defend the latter.
Of course, if Leo ever dared to speak with the authoritative voice of the Catholic Church, he would find himself opposed not only by the pacifist Left (in whose ranks Prevost has served since the 1980s7 , joining the Young Augustinians movement8 , or Augustinians for Peace which was sponsored by the Italian Communist Party), but also by the “theo-con” Right, with which quite a few Catholic conservatives are dangerously aligned. The tolerance that the Conciliar Hierarchy currently enjoys is, in fact, conditional upon its acceptance and promotion not only of the globalist agenda of the UN, the World Economic Forum in Davos, and the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican founded by Bergoglio in collaboration with Lynn Forester de Rothschild, but also of the liberal agenda of the Anglo-Zionist lobby. In other words, it depends on two supranational powers operating on seemingly opposing fronts yet pursuing a common objective: the establishment of a New World Order, in which, regardless of which side ultimately prevails in the conflict, the sole victim of persecution will invariably be Catholicism – specifically, that Traditional Catholicism which Rome is striving by every means to destroy or subsume by “conciliarizing” and “synodalizing” it.
According to Trump’s admonition, “Leo should get his act together as Pope […] and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician.” Indeed, the election of an American “pope” from Chicago, steeped in heretical doctrines acquired during his years of ministry in Latin America, devoted to the cult of Pachamama, and ideologically aligned – by his own admission – with the worst progressivism of the infamous Cardinals Bernardin and Cupich, appears to have been deliberately orchestrated to serve as a counterweight to the President of the United States. ...
The unanimous chorus of the mainstream media and the neo-papists serves as proof that Leo is not speaking as a pope but rather as a standard-bearer for anti-Trumpism, so to speak. This is because the accolades come from figures – both within and outside the ecclesial body – who possess nothing of the Catholic spirit, and who would be the very first to crucify Prevost were he to dare express even the slightest doubt regarding the untouchable “dogms”s of the radical Left. Furthermore, this defense of Prevost is motivated precisely by the fact that the “pope” has chosen to play the politician, thereby demonstrating a partisanship that discredits both the Papacy and the Catholic Church in the eyes of the world. For this reason, Leo truly ought to “get his act together as Pope” – a task that is, however, exceedingly difficult for someone like him, who was chosen precisely because his support for the globalist agenda would be not merely coerced, but spontaneous and convinced; and because Leo is being kept under close watch by the emissaries of those Powers who have absolutely no intention of relinquishing the positions they have secured within the Catholic Church, now that they stand so tantalizingly close to the finish line.
When Our Lord Jesus Christ is recognized as King of the Nations, no Antichrist will dare to claim the title of Messiah. And when He is recognized as King and High Priest within the Church, no Vicar of His will dare to subvert His teaching or demolish His Church. If this is happening today, before our very eyes, it is because we are living in eschatological times in which Our Lord has been dethroned from His Divine Kingship by the Nations, and from His Eternal Priesthood by His own Ministers. Therefore, in judging present events, let us not allow ourselves to be beguiled by abstract speculations, nor let us attempt to alter reality to suit our own illusions. Let us view all that is unfolding through a supernatural lens, for this is the only way to preserve, amidst our present tribulations, that peace of soul which the world neither knows how to give, nor can give (Jn 14:27).
+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
Viterbo, 17 April MMXXVI
S.cti Aniceti Papæ et Martyris
Spiritual Intelligence Briefing #20: What EVERYONE ABSOLUTELY is Missing!!! - YouTube--Dr. John-Michael Redenbo:
"Other than the word of God, what is the purest stream of hearing directly from God? Dreams. Why? Because only God can give you dreams. So, if that's the case and we want to know what is God saying, guess where we're going to go? We're going to look at our dreams. So, what has God said about President Trump?
Well, let's look at some of the things that he said recently. In fact, something else that the president posted even recently that was in the news which has to do with a prophecy from a while ago and we want to take a look at it. It was a prophecy posted, again this was initially put out by Kim Clement. It was put out by Kim Clement and it's it's known as the Trump will be uh Trump will be a trumpet prophecy. But I'm just going to read you a part of this.
I am God and you have called to me and many from this nation have said enough.Enough of religion, enough of dead speech. The spirit of God, this is a moment of resurrection for the spirit of the Lord. For the spirit of God says, "Honor me with your praise and acceptance of this that I say to you, this that shall take place shall be the most unusual thing, a transfiguration, a going to the marketplace, if you wish, into the news media where Time magazine will have no choice but to say what I want them to say. Newsweek, what I want to say, the View, what I want to say. Trump shall become a trumpet, says the Lord. I will raise up Trump to become a trumpet."Now, again, it's in the context. I've done two whole videos on the whole concept of Trump being a trumpet. So you can go back and watch those. But it's interesting that it's in the context of right here. Time magazine will have no choice but to say what I want them to say. Newsweek what I want to say. The View what I want to say. Trump will be a trumpet.So what's the implication? The implication is Trump will say what the Lord wants him to say. Why? Because he's talking about people in the media and he's saying they're going to say what I want them to say." .......
Why is Leo the Cowardly Lion dressing like Dr. Donald Trump?
“It’s Blasphemy like no one has ever seen before! That I can tell you!”
ps; The Lord told his prophet Kim that He would make the Media say what He wanted them to say.
And you can’t assert blasphemy without first asserting the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, praise God!
Matthew 10
8 Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse those who have leprosy, drive out demons. Freely you have received; freely give.
Yes, Lord!
