Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Red Flag, Inc.

Law? What Law?

“The American flag represents the unity of our country and its people. No matter what may divide us, Old Glory should be revered and cherished, as a symbol of all that makes America the greatest country in the world. As we honor our beautiful flag on this day and throughout this week, let us vow never to forget the tremendous sacrifices made by patriots from generation to generation to ensure that the red, white, and blue continues to fly high and free."--The Actual President Donald J. Trump

“Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15.”–Actual President Ronald Reagan



Up
Similarly, patriots believe every day is Flag Day, but this Junta believes every day is a Red Flag Day.

Tucker Carlson: This is a total lie - YouTube

1.) Authorities already had SCREAMING RED FLAGS on almost every shooting or attack, flags which they ignored--or worse. From Lee Harvey Oswald to Muhammed Atta to Ft. Hood to Pulse Nightclub to the Boston Marathon to Nickolas Cruz to Uvalde to the Buffalo shooter--the list is endless. If they are already ignoring real RED FLAGS, why would a new law help?

2.) Forget warnings--Soros DAs don't even prosecute actual gun crimes.


3.) Get back to me when Fake Attorney Genital Merrick Garland files gun charges against Hunter Biden.


4.) When Garland says White Supremacists are the real problem, he doesn't mean his NAZI allies in Ukraine. He means white people who voted for the Actual President. And the millions and millions of minorities, too. They're honorary White Supremacists. In other words, the majority of American citizens are designated as Enemies of the State by this Occupation Government, while they send weapons to REAL NAZIS.


5.) Defying a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling while calling Donald Trump a scofflaw dictator. Commie, please.


6.) Mollie on Twitter: "No rational actor would trust the FBI or DOJ to impartially handle new powers and authorities. Anyone proposing giving them new authority as opposed to removing authority, disbanding them, defunding them, or putting them under strict oversight, is unworthy of elected office."


7.) PROVABLY AND DEMONSTRABLY, THEY DO NOT GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT GUN DEATHS, OR ANY OTHER DEATHS BUT THEIR OWN, FOR THAT MATTER. THEY JUST KILLED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WITH THE VIRUS/VAXX BIOWEAPONS AND MAIMED COUNTLESS NUMBERS OF CHILDREN.


They want to disarm Americans so they can keep stealing elections until they’ve finished installing their precious World Government. In other words, they want to disarm those who know what they are really up to.


8.) RED FLAG 'LAWS' ARE REALLY RED HAT LAWS.


ASK ANY RED.



"...Wut?"



1 comment:

  1. Came across the blog from another site. Given the references to Scripture in the blog title and elsewhere*, these verses are offered relating to the way we are advised within to conduct ourselves and communicate:

    Col. 3:8 — “But now you yourselves are to put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy language out of your mouth.”

    Eph. 4:29 — “Do not let any unwholesome word go forth out of your mouth, but only good, for edification of the need, so that it may give grace to those hearing.”

    Eph. 5:4 — “Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.”

    Col. 3:1-2 — “If then you were raised with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your mind on things above, not things on the earth.”

    * noting the use of “the Message“, here’s something about the one who produced that entity, Eugene Peterson:

    https://religionnews.com/2017/07/12/eugene-peterson-on-changing-his-mind-about-same-sex-issues-and-marriage/

    "I have been in (Presbyterian) churches when I was an associate pastor where there were several women who were lesbians. They didn’t make a big deal about it. I’d go and visit them and it never came up for them. They just assumed that they were as Christian as everybody else in the church."

    That might go towards showing why relying on such a work as an acceptable version of Scripture appears problematic, and there appear to be plenty of sites and articles exploring that matter further

    ReplyDelete