OUTRAGE: The Obama Deep State Wiretapped President Trump's White House Counsel

NY Times Then Blames Trump for Wiretapping Himself

That takes balls, even for the Professional Liars at the Times.

New York Times Reports Andrew Weissmann and Robert Mueller Sought, Then Hid, Special Counsel Surveillance of Trump White House Attorney Don McGhan - The Last Refuge (theconservativetreehouse.com):

"...The New York Times headline is massive spin: “Apple Is Said to Have Turned Over Data on Trump’s White House Counsel in 2018”.

Notice what the New York Times is doing here.  Everything about their article is written to hide, obfuscate and ignore the reality of what their article actually is revealing. Look closely:

“tactics by the Trump Justice Department“?

This is far beyond spin, it is an intentional effort at cognitive dissonance.  Perhaps this article is written now because the Durham investigation is going to reveal how Mueller and Weissmann conducted investigative surveillance over the Trump White House…  Likely, but rather than supposition let’s just go to the reality of the details.

The headline positions Apple as the center, but the real nub of the revelation is that Weissmann and Mueller used the Special Counsel and FBI to conduct surveillance on the White House legal counsel, and his family, while President Donald Trump was in office.   Think about that for a moment.  Think about it carefully."......

Once upon a time, this would have rocked the nation, But once you've conducted an actual American Coup, I guess it's par for the course.

There is no "Trump Justice Department" and never was. If they answered to any president at all back then, it was Shadow President Obama in his third term.

There are, however. three Branches of Government: The FBI, the CIA and the DNI.

They wiretapped the White House Counsel through Apple. As I said, once upon a time that would have stopped the nation in its tracks. It's amazing how far and how fast Obama has normalized Gestapo-ism.

"Trump officials" were also blamed for investigating Swalwell and Schiff.  

"Trump officials" is also an old game. Mueller and Weissman were technically "Trump officials". The jelly-filled Vindman Twins, too. Even Comey and McCabe.

If the Democrat Bureau of Investigation and the Dept. of Democrat Justice spied on some fellow Democrats, too, that usually happens like this:

1.) Somebody pissed off Obama (Blagojevich)
2.) It just got too big to ignore (Kwame)
3.) Charged but given a sweetheart deal, not to roll on the Bigger Fish, but to keep silent (Wolfe, Clinesmith)
4.) Charged for appearances’ sake, but rigged for acquittal (Greg Craig)
5.) Phony “investigation” designed to bury evidence (Hillary, Hunter Biden)
6.) Keeping that evidence for J. Edgar-style kompromat and leverage over politicians (also Hunter Biden)

If Schiff and Swalwell were spied on by Mueller or some other Deep State pals, it was probably to protect Swalwell from the Fang Fang  Bang Bang-story and Schiff from the Ed Buck story. 

And for the kompromat. 

                                                   "Sorry. I want my fourth term now."

Related: Glenn Greenwald:

"I'm a little unclear about this massive CNN/NBC/WPost freakout today about questions regarding FBI infiltration of the groups behind 1/6. DHS has been warning for 2 years at that they pose the greatest threat. Do people doubt that FBI infiltrated them & had informants in them?
The FBI had at least one informant in the group charged with the plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer. They constantly used informants/infiltrators to steer plots from the first War on Terror. Why are people so doubtful that they had informants in these groups?
I can't even count how many "terror plots" I reported on as part of the first War on Terror that were designed, driven and even funded by the FBI, but it was a lot. They'd instigate their own plots, then congratulate themselves for stopping them.
It's important because government leaders are comparing it to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor, demanding billions more in spending on the US security state, and plotting to obtain more surveillance and detention authorities in its name.".......

The #VeryFake News Media was freaking out, Glenn, because it was supposed to be a spontaneous Insurrection by Trump extremists that caught everyone off guard--not a thoughtfully-planned and well-rehearsed Reichstag-event staged by Nancy Pelosi, FBI informants, rogue Capitol Police and ANTIFA plants.

That's why she twice refused President Trump's offer of National Guard. They would have screwed up her master plan to attack her own workplace and blame the actual winner of the election.

The FBI is also hiding the identity of the pipe bomber they claim to be hunting. Trump supporters there that day caught him and gave him to Capitol Police

Greenwald makes a good point: This is supposedly 9/11 and Pearl Harbor combined--but Pelosi is hiding the videotapes.

That's because they will show all her minions rehearsing this fraud beforehand.

Matt Taibbi: "The Domestic War on Terror rollout reads almost exactly like the original. Same calls for budget increases and expanded powers, same theme of organized transnational threats all around us, same surveillance state endgame.

Soaring LIBERTY: If you are a white male Conservative, you will be surveilled by Biden’s internal security services. If you riot with BLM or Antifa, you get a free pass.

Matt Tiabbi: This is going to be a theme of conservative coverage of this phenomenon, but it’s not true. An expanded surveillance state will be used against all types of political dissidents, just as the digital censorship movement has hit right, left, and in between.”…….

Tiabbi is right that the Occupation Government will go after the Left too when it suits them, but ANTIFA is funded by Soros and obeyed orders from Pelosi not to fight Trump supporters in the streets, but to show up at the Capitol in disguise. The Left is simply not a threat to these criminals the way 100 million awakened patriots are.

Angelo Codevilla: Fighting the Extremism Fight › American Greatness 

What might happen if Republican senators were serious about confronting the Biden Administration’s political weaponization of the intelligence community?

"Ever since 2009 or so, when serious opposition to government policy developed especially but not exclusively among conservative-minded Americans, the FBI has infiltrated domestic opposition groups with the same Patriot Act tools that it used against affiliates of al-Qaeda. Though the FBI was unable to affect, nevermind control, the massive Tea Party movement, smaller groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, and even ad hoc minuscule ones are led and exist largely as creatures of the FBI.

As with Islamic radicals, the FBI’s antiterrorism work nowadays consists almost exclusively of leading persons in the groups that it influences into near-crimes, and then to prosecutions that it touts as triumphs. The difference is that leading a few conservative Americans into what can be called conspiracies to commit crimes that exist because of the FBI’s own involvement serves to impute illegitimacy if not illegality to the millions of ordinary conservative Americans the government claims these organizations represent. This too, the senators might say, is a totalitarian tactic that America must not tolerate.".......

Read it all.

HUGE DEVELOPMENT: NSA Reveals in FOIA Response that the FBI Involved in "Improper Surveillance" of 16,000 Americans (thegatewaypundit.com)