Saturday, December 21, 2019

The Impeachment Dossier: I'd Be Concerned If These Corrupt Swine *DIDN'T* Impeach the President

It Only Proves That He's a Silver Cross In a Town Full of Shabby Vampires
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."--Winston Churchill

When China feels threatened, they make Kim bluster and shoot off missiles. Similarly, the Deep State feels threatened, so they are making Nancy dance the Impeachment Jig as a pre-buttal and counter-narrative to the Durham Probe.

You may not think Barr is serious–but they seem to. And so do I.

CTH: “There is an argument to be made the rushed House articles are a means to an end. That is – a way for House lawyers to argue in court all of the constitutionally contended material is required as evidence for pending judicial proceedings, a trial in the Senate. This would explain why all the prior evidence debated for inclusion and legal additions to “articles of impeachment” were dropped.  Instead the House focused only on quickly framing two articles that can facilitate pending court cases. If accurate, that perspective means the grand jury material is the unspoken goal and impeachment is simply the enhanced means to obtain it. The 6(e) material relates to evidence gathered by the Mueller team for grand jury proceedings in their two-year effort to construct a case against President Trump. Remember, the Mueller evidence was gathered during a counterintelligence investigation, which means all things Trump -including his family and business interests- were subject to unbridled surveillance for two years; and a host of intelligence gathering going back in time indefinitely.  A goldmine of political opposition research. Obviously if Jerry Nadler could get his hands on this material it would quickly find its way into the DNC, and ultimately to the 2020 democrat candidate for president. ...My suspicion is the articles of impeachment are a means to an end, and not the end itself."

It’s not impeachment, it’s opposition research. An Impeachment Dossier, if you will.

It is aimed at getting the Weissman/Mueller spying released to use in the 2020 campaign. Weissman no doubt already gave Democrats these wiretaps, but they can’t safely use them yet. Corrupt swine.

Mitch: “It’s beyond me how the speaker and Democratic leader in the Senate think withholding the articles of impeachment and not sending them over gives them leverage, Frankly, I’m not anxious to have the trial. If she thinks her case is so weak she doesn’t want to send it over, throw me into that briar patch.”

Mitch is essentially conceding that he can’t have the trial without Nanzi’s permission. Oh, HELL, no.

I think they’re trying to bait and trap the White House into agreeing that the President was not impeached until Pelosi sends the Articles over. That view concedes that Pelosi has the power to determine when a trial will be held. Pelosi wants to drag this out forever, maybe hoping to flip the Senate after the President’s re-election and deny him his second term.

Pelosi and Schumer are demanding a fair trial for the prosecution–but fair trial-rights are for the accused, not prosecutors. And we’ve already seen what they mean by “fair”–a Soviet-style Hangin’ Court.

The accused is also entitled to a speedy trial. They are seeking to deny that to the President as well.

This isn’t grown-up impeachment. It is an Impeachment Dossier, a political “wrap-up smear"-job, another intended fix for yet another election.

Mitch needs to stop this evil fraud now. No hiding behind “tradition”. Now.
"'How's my slice?' Funny you should ask..."
Make America Globalist Again--A Mitch Moment UPDATE:

Fox: "Do you have the Constitutional authority to conduct a trial without her sending them over?"
McConnell: "I don't think so."

Bullshit, Mitch. He just gave Pelosi permission to stall and stall while folding in more charges. What an ass. He makes it sound like he’s supporting the president, but he just said he has no Constitutional right to proceed with President Trump’s acquittal until Pelosi gives him permission. And she's stalling for her court cases.

She’s in no hurry because this is a pr stunt anyway, an Impeachment Dossier. Pelosi's purpose is not really to remove the President. She's trying to protect the last president. 

Democrats want to establish the Big Lie that President Trump used foreigners to frame Biden and rig the next election when, in fact, the exact opposite is true:
Obama/Biden used foreigners to frame Trump and rig the last election. 


She knows this is all coming out soon and she's using Impeachment as a pre-buttal and a counter-narrative, as well as a campaign commercial.

Pelosi says she wants a "fair trial". Mitch says the Senate doesn't even want it. But the right to a fair trial doesn't belong to the prosecutors and the right to a speedy trial doesn't belong to the jurors. Both rights belong to President Trump.

By pretending he is helpless, Mitch gains leverage over the President by holding the acquittal over his head.

Who would play such a devious and corrupt double-game?

I dunno'--ask the Tea Party. That's just how Mitch rolls. Ass.
"...and here's the best part, Ted--I even got him to write a new forward for my book!"

UPDATE: Attorney Lin Wood suggests a Writ of Mandamus at the Supreme Court to force the issue.
Daily Wire: “What Pelosi wants to avoid is the outcome of any trial in the Senate: a bipartisan vote to acquit.”

No comments:

Post a Comment