Friday, April 29, 2022

OBiden's Ministry of Truth: Neither Ministers Nor True. Discuss.

"You're welcome."
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."--English writer Evelyn Beatrice Hall

"Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too."--Lefty blogger François-Marie Arouet, blog nic; "Voltaire"

"There is Freedom of Speech, but I cannot guarantee freedom after speech."-- His Excellency, President-for-Life, Field Marshall, Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth, Fishes of the Sea, and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.

"Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one's thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down. They know its power. Thrones, dominions, principalities, and powers, founded in injustice and wrong, are sure to tremble, if men are allowed to reason... Equally clear is the right to hear. To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker."--Frederick Douglass

"What the Covid-19 panic has revealed, and continues to reveal, is the managerial elite has no respect for things like the rule of law, individual liberty or any of the other foundation items of consensual government. To protect democracy, they will rig the election process. To keep us free they will strip us of our rights. In the name of inclusion and diversity they will exclude anyone who disagrees. What we are seeing is that the real plague on our society is the ruling class."-- Z-Man

“Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.Prof. Noam Chomsky

When you've lost Noam...

"In his opening monologue tonight, Fox News host Tucker Carlson outlined the latest Dept of Homeland Security agency, the “Disinformation Governance Board,” and the head of the social media control agency, Nina Jankowicz.  WATCH:

BACKGROUND – Previously the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) announced a new Dept of Homeland Security priority to combat disinformation {LINK} on technology platforms including social media.

Many eyebrows were raised as the announcement appeared to be an open admission that the U.S. government was going to control information by applying labels… that would align with allies in social media…. who need a legal justification for censorship and content removal. ...

For two years the control mechanisms around information have been cemented by govt and Big Tech.  Even the deployment of the linguistics around disinformation, misinformation and malinformation is all part of that collective effort.  The collaboration between the government and Big Tech is not a matter for debate, it is all easily referenced by their own admissions.   The current issue is how they are deploying the information controls.

We have COVID-19, the vaccination effort and now Ukraine as examples of the collaboration to control information, to control what people are permitted to question and discuss on the internet.  Now things are getting much more detailed, and more alarming.

Shortly after Elon Musk made a bid to purchase a single information platform, Twitter, and then expressed his intent to open the speech valves, former Obama administration intelligence officials wrote a letter {SEE HERE} warning about efforts to break up the information control by Big Tech and Social Media.

That letter was shortly followed by a speech delivered by Obama himself where he specifically demanded that government take a larger role in the control of information {LINK}, essentially promoting an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’ to control information in the public sphere."


"...50 nation intelligence ministers getting together to decide what they will permit on the internet. Apparently, a collective partner rule book is forthcoming.   Big Tech will be given specific instructions on how to comply. The global rulebook on how to handle, define and eliminate ‘disinformation’, ‘misinformation’ and ‘malinformation’ on the world-wide internet.

"Old Joe Biden’s ominous Disinformation Governance Board has just been announced, and it’s already expanding the scope of its responsibilities. Of course, that’s what government agencies do. They’re always looking to justify and increase their budgets, and so they’re always looking for new things to involve themselves in. But in this case, the expansion makes the agency in question even more dangerous to the American people than it was already. 

...Mayorkas, however, went farther than that almost immediately, saying on Thursday: “We have just established a mis- and disinformation governance board in the Department of Homeland Security to more effectively combat this threat not only to election security, but to our homeland security.” And when Jen Psaki defended Biden’s new Ministry of Truth on Thursday, she went farther still: “We know there has been a range of [disinformation] out there about a range of topics, I mean, including COVID for example, and also elections and eligibility.”

Yes, of course Psaki supports this flagrantly unconstitutional effort to police what Americans say and think. She even professed to be surprised that anyone would oppose this sinister new initiative: “It sounds like the objective of the board is to prevent disinformation and misinformation from traveling around the country in a range of communities. I’m not sure who opposes that effort.

Well, let’s start with everyone who realizes that yesterday’s “disinformation” — Trump didn’t collude with Russia, Hunter Biden’s laptop contains evidence of influence-peddling with Joe Biden’s involvement — is today’s breaking news. Then there are those who are deeply concerned that the government will crack down on dissenting opinions under the guise of fighting “disinformation.” In short, anyone who understands the vital importance of the freedom of speech will oppose the very existence of the Disinformation Governance Board, and be even more alarmed by the fact that it started out on Wednesday focusing on alleged disinformation concerning illegal migration and Russia, and by the very next day had already apparently expanded its purview to include COVID, as well as “elections and eligibility.”

It’s clear that Biden’s handlers aren’t trying to maintain even a semblance of even-handedness here. When they say “disinformation,” they mean “conservative opinions” and “criticism of the Left.”.......
"Eligibility"--that means these power-mad scumbags think they get to decide if MTG and others gets to run for office. Madness.
Nina Jankowicz on Twitter: "You can just call me the Mary Poppins of disinformation 💁🏻‍♀️"

Super-callous lipstick freak sounds like a Free-Speech hoarder
She thinks the Right to Speak Your Mind is just for Joe’s supporters
for Communists and Globalists and New York Times reporters
but not for MAGA patriots, whom she calls Big Distorters

Super-Cali’s Mexico, now that we have no Border
But if you even mention it, reported to Headquarters
They’ve turned our brave Border Patrol into Bellhops and Porters
Now Homeland Security is a Homeland Aborter.

She wouldn’t even have a job in Biden’s Speech Suppression
Were it not for Voting Fraud in the last so-called “election”
Thanks a lot for Virus/Vaxx and all your Bio-Weapons
$200 billion for Ukraine, for Main Street a Depression

Super-Phallus Bidens screwing children in the showers
Sending Feds to kick down doors in a display of power
Plans Coups and Wars and grifts and whores and otherwise deflowers
Then sends some bitch to Crush the Rights we’ve had since the Mayflower!

Superfluous singing doofus called Miss Information
Why don’t you ban the Big Guy and his verbal constipation?
He hasn’t said one true thing yet since crooked Installation
But if you speak his Jabberwock, we’d love an explanation.


That was more fun than a Canadian Bank Run--in Greek!


Weird Gal Jankovic says revolutions are justified by Oligarchy and rigged elections. Second look! 

Say--wouldn't she have to censor herself for supporting Insurrections? 

She's also a "Global Fellow at the Wilson Center's Kennan Institute.". The late Mr. Kennan, of course, DESPISED the expansion of NATO and the Russia-baiting which is at the root of this Deep State Crime Wave, as described here: George F. Kennan and The Limits of Your Fucking Bullshit, Pal

She would eventually have to censor him, too.
The Actual Governor: “You cannot have a Ministry of Truth in this country. We’re not going to let Biden get away with this one. So we will be fighting back. What they want to do, is they want to be able to put out false narratives without people being able to speak out and fight back, They want to be able to advocate for COVID lockdowns. They want to be able to advocate for school closures—things that are not supported by the evidence—but then when you speak out, they want to stifle dissent. We reject this bureau in the state of Florida. We think it’s essential for Floridians and Americans are able to speak out against false narratives being jammed down our throats by this Regime. This is not acceptable, and in Florida, we’re not going to have it. So let’s get real here, let’s make sure we’re doing things to benefit Floridians and Americans but we’re not going to let Biden get away with this one.”

"You cannot extend the mastery of government over the daily life of a people without somewhere making it master of people's souls and thoughts.… Every step in that direction poisons the very roots of liberalism. It poisons political equality, free speech, free press, and equality of opportunity. It is the road not to more liberty but to less liberty."--
Herbert Hoover

"Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood: it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?

Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things; it has predisposed men to endure them and often to look on them as benefits.

After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."--Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 
(Volume 2, Section 4: Chapter VI, What Sort of Despotism Democratic Nations Have to Fear.)


"There is a threat posed to human freedom by the enormous power of the modern state. History teaches the dangers of government that overreaches -- political control taking precedence over free economic growth, secret police, mindless bureaucracy, all combining to stifle individual excellence and personal freedom. ...What I am describing now is a plan and a hope for the long term -- the march of freedom and democracy which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history as it has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people."
--Actual President Ronald Reagan, 
Westminster Speech, 1982 




                                                                                    Blow
 
UPDATE: Busted: Biden's Minister of Truth Told Congress She Does Not Believe Government Should Fight Disinformation (trendingpolitics.com)

Scary Poppins to Jeff Flake 2 years ago:

“Thank you very much, Congressman. I totally understand your aversion to the idea that government would fight back against disinformation. In fact, you know, the use of that term has been basically the foundation to some very draconian fake news laws in places like Russia, or even Singapore. I do not believe that government should be in that business either.”

Today: “Honored to be serving in the Biden Administration @DHSgov and helping shape our counter-disinformation efforts.”

This entire Occupation Government is itself a Disinformation Governance Board, starting with the lies they tell themselves before getting out of bed in the morning.

Or in Joe’s case, the afternoon.


No comments:

Post a Comment