Thursday, April 7, 2022

Revolution in the Hair: Mel Brooks and Joe Biden Agree: "The People are Revolting!"

"The revolution was effected, before the war commenced. The revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people. A change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations. While the king, and all in authority under him, were believed to govern in justice and mercy, according to the laws and constitution derived to them from the God of nature, and transmitted to them by their ancestors—they thought themselves bound to pray for the king, and queen, and all the royal family, and all in authority, under them, as ministers ordained of God for their good. But when they saw those powers renouncing all the principles of authority, and bent upon the destruction of all the securities of their lives, liberties and properties, they thought it their duty to pray for the Continental Congress, and all the thirteen state congresses, &c. There might be, and there were others, who thought less about religion and conscience, but had certain habitual sentiments of allegiance and loyalty derived from their education; but believing allegiance and protection to be reciprocal, when protection was withdrawn, they thought allegiance was dissolved. Another alteration was common to all. The people of America had been educated in an habitual affection for England, as their mother country; and while they thought her a kind and tender parent, (erroneously enough, however, for she never was such a mother,) no affection could be more sincere. But when they found her a cruel beldam, willing like lady Macbeth, to “dash their brains out,” it is no wonder if their filial affections ceased, and were changed into indignation and horror. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution."--John Adams to Hezekiah Niles, February 13,  1818

Count de Monay: "I've come on the most urgent of business. It is said that the People are revolting!"
Louis the Fourteenth: "You said it. They stink on ice!"

"Some boast of being friends to government; I am a friend to righteous government, to a government founded upon the principles of reason and justice; but I glory in publicly avowing my eternal enmity to tyranny. Is the present system... a righteous government – or is it tyranny? ...Surely you never will tamely suffer this country to be a den of thieves. Remember, my friends, from whom you sprang. Let not a meanness of spirit, unknown to those whom you boast of as your fathers, excite a thought to the dishonor of your mothers I conjure you, by all that is dear, by all that is honorable, by all that is sacred, not only that ye pray, but that ye act; that, if necessary, ye fight, and even die, for the prosperity of our Jerusalem. Break in sunder, with noble disdain, the bonds with which the Philistines have bound you. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed, by the soft arts of luxury and effeminacy, into the pit digged for your destruction. Despise the glare of wealth. That people who pay greater respect to a wealthy villain than to an honest, upright man in poverty, almost deserve to be enslaved; they plainly show that wealth, however it may be acquired, is, in their esteem, to be preferred to virtue."
--John Hancock, Boston Massacre Speech, March 5, 1774

"I lived with them on Montague Street
In a basement down the stairs
There was music in the cafés at night
And revolution in the air
Then he started into dealing with slaves
And something inside of him died
She had to sell everything she owned
And froze up inside
And when finally the bottom fell out
I became withdrawn
The only thing I knew how to do
Was to keep on keepin’ on like a bird that flew
Tangled up in blue"
--Bob Dylan, 1974

“Corruption is a cancer, a cancer that eats away at a citizen’s faith in democracy. Corruption is just another form of tyranny.”Vice President Joe Biden, while in Romania to pick up a suitcase full of cash, 2012

It was mostly peaceful bribery. .................................................................................

It took 12 years from the Proclamation of 1763, ending Walpole's "Salutary Neglect" of the Colonies, to open hostilities with the Royal Occupation Government in 1775 at Lexington & Concord and Bunker Hill.

Things move a lot quicker these days.

"That, I can tell you."

The Root Causes of the American Revolution (thoughtco.com)--Martin Kelly:

The Freedoms and Restrictions of Location

The geography of the colonies also contributed to the Revolution. Their distance from Great Britain naturally created a sense of independence that was hard to overcome. Those willing to colonize the new world generally had a strong independent streak with a profound desire for new opportunities and more freedom. The Proclamation of 1763 played its own role. After the French and Indian War, King George III issued the royal decree that prevented further colonization west of the Appalachian Mountains. The intent was to normalize relations with the Indigenous peoples, many of whom fought with the French. A number of settlers had purchased land in the now forbidden area or had received land grants. The crown's proclamation was largely ignored as settlers moved anyway and the "Proclamation Line" eventually moved after much lobbying. Despite this concession, the affair left another stain on the relationship between the colonies and Britain.

The Control of Government

The existence of colonial legislatures meant that the colonies were in many ways independent of the crown. The legislatures were allowed to levy taxes, muster troops, and pass laws. Over time, these powers became rights in the eyes of many colonists. The British government had different ideas and attempted to curtail the powers of these newly elected bodies. There were numerous measures designed to ensure the colonial legislatures did not achieve autonomy, although many had nothing to do with the larger British Empire. In the minds of colonists, they were a matter of local concern. From these small, rebellious legislative bodies that represented the colonists, the future leaders of the United States were born.

The Economic Troubles

Even though the British believed in mercantilism, Prime Minister Robert Walpole espoused a view of "salutary neglect." This system was in place from 1607 through 1763, during which the British were lax on enforcement of external trade relations. Walpole believed this enhanced freedom would stimulate commerce. The French and Indian War led to considerable economic trouble for the British government. Its cost was significant, and the British were determined to make up for the lack of funds. They levied new taxes on the colonists and increased trade regulations. These actions were not well received by the colonists. New taxes were enforced, including the Sugar Act and the Currency Act, both in 1764. The Sugar Act increased already considerable taxes on molasses and restricted certain export goods to Britain alone. The Currency Act prohibited the printing of money in the colonies, making businesses rely more on the crippled British economy. Feeling underrepresented, overtaxed, and unable to engage in free trade, the colonists rallied to the slogan, "No Taxation Without Representation." This discontent became very apparent in 1773 with the events that later became known as the Boston Tea Party.

The Corruption and Control

The British government's presence became increasingly more visible in the years leading to the revolution. British officials and soldiers were given more control over the colonists and this led to widespread corruption. Among the most glaring of these issues were the "Writs of Assistance." These were general search warrants that gave British soldiers the right to search and seize any property they deemed to be smuggled or illegal goods. Designed to assist the British in enforcing trade laws, these documents allowed British soldiers to enter, search, and seize warehouses, private homes, and ships whenever necessary. However, many abused this power. In 1761, Boston lawyer James Otis fought for the constitutional rights of the colonists in this matter but lost. The defeat only inflamed the level of defiance and ultimately led to the Fourth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. The Third Amendment was also inspired by the overreach of the British government. Forcing colonists to house British soldiers in their homes infuriated the population. It was inconvenient and costly to the colonists, and many also found it a traumatic experience after events like the Boston Massacre in 1770.

The Criminal Justice System

Trade and commerce were overly controlled, the British Army made its presence known, and the local colonial government was limited by a power far across the Atlantic Ocean. If these affronts to the colonists' dignity were not enough to ignite the fires of rebellion, American colonists also had to endure a corrupt justice system. Political protests became a regular occurrence as these realities set in. In 1769, Alexander McDougall was imprisoned for libel when his work "To the Betrayed Inhabitants of the City and Colony of New York" was published. His imprisonment and the Boston Massacre were just two infamous examples of the measures the British took to crack down on protesters. After six British soldiers were acquitted and two dishonorably discharged for the Boston Massacre—ironically enough, they were defended by John Adams—the British government changed the rules. From then on, officers accused of any offense in the colonies would be sent to England for trial. This meant that fewer witnesses would be on hand to give their accounts of events and it led to even fewer convictions. To make matters even worse, jury trials were replaced with verdicts and punishments handed down directly by colonial judges. Over time, the colonial authorities lost power over this as well because the judges were known to be chosen, paid, and supervised by the British government. The right to a fair trial by a jury of their peers was no longer possible for many colonists.

Grievances That Led to Revolution and the Constitution

All of these grievances that colonists had with the British government led to the events of the American Revolution. And many of these grievances directly affected what the Founding Fathers wrote into the U.S. Constitution. These Constitutional rights and principles reflect the hopes of the Framers that the new American government would not subject their citizens to the same loss of freedoms that the colonists had experienced under Britain's rule.".......

Parallelism | The Z Blog (thezman.com)

"There is no solution to the problems of liberal democracy at the ballot box. Most Americans have no representation in politics as both parties are committed to destroying normal life. This fall the Republicans will win the election and everything will get worse. Whatever promises they have made will be broken on day one. They will set about giving the oligarchs whatever they want while pretending they are doing their voters a favor.

Even knowing this, people want to do something. This is even more true for dissidents who are more political than normal people. The reason you end up on this side of the great divide is you have engaged with politics and learned from it. Walking away entirely seems like quitting to most people. On the other hand, participating just empowers the people who want you dead. This is the dilemma that ruined the conservative movement and haunts the dissident right.

This leaves only one option and that is building a counter culture. Channeling activism into building a parallel society bridges the gap between ideas and activism. In a way, this is what we see globally with the alliance of non-Western powers. China, Russia and India want to create a parallel system that can challenge America. The same thing has to happen domestically. It is a bigger challenge for obvious reasons, but parallelism is the only way forward short of revolution.".......

comment image
Exclusive: Interview With Hunter Biden Laptop Whistleblower (substack.com)

EMERALD ROBINSON: The dam has finally broken since the establishment has decided that Biden himself is too broken to be president much longer. Now at MSNBC, the Hill, Yahoo, all are reporting on the Biden's shady business deals after nearly two years of covering for the family. CBS reporting Wednesday, that US banks flagged more than 150 transactions involving either Hunter Biden, or his uncle James Biden, and their global business deals.

Now only did the media attempt to suppress the news about the laptop, but so did us intelligence and federal law enforcement and one man who tried to get the word out to get the information to the public and is responsible for a lot of what we know about the Biden business deals and what is on that laptop is now afraid for his safety. Jack Maxy was approached by Rudy Giuliani and Bernie Kerick in 2020 to help access the laptop. Maxi then gave a copy of the laptop to the Daily Mail who independently verified its authenticity. Now Maxi is fled to Switzerland where he is working on making public another 450 gigabytes of deleted material. And Jack Maxi joins us now from Switzerland. Welcome Jack.

EMERALD: Jack. I want to get into what you're currently working on in a moment, but first off, just tell us what, what caused so much concern for you that you felt that you had to flee the USA to Switzerland?

JACK MAXEY: Well, in February of last year, under advice from people who were very worried about my safety, uh, I was told that I need to release a certain amount of information to the web so that the, uh, guys in the black Suburbans would know that I could release it all. I've been able to release it all for over a year. I haven't done that because I wanna protect the multiple, uh, female trafficked victims and some underage people that are on that laptop. So we decided to put 8,000 emails onto Dropboxes one in New Zealand, two in the United States, two in the United Kingdom. Uh, these are the same Dropboxes that they tell us that, uh, child pornography is shared on with impunity. None of those Dropboxes lasted for more than 70 minutes. Some of them were down in almost seconds. These are all five eyes countries. That would be the five eyes intelligence sharing agreement between New Zealand, Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Uh, so in desperation, a European colleague recommended I try something called Swiss transfer. I did, and I uploaded those files. Hundreds of times, giving the opportunity to download about 25 or 30 each time I did it. I did that on Twitter, openly on social media and towards the end of that operation to whi banned me for life. After first, sending me a letter saying that they heard I was gonna commit suicide. And about two hours later, they banned me forever.

EMERALD: Now let me ask you, Jack, you approached lots of outlets and tried to offer this information copies of the laptop, the drive to multiple media outlets, but many of them didn't take you up on that. Isn't that correct?

MAXEY: That's true. I sent emails to most of the major papers in America. I sent, uh, offers to the Fox News on multiple occasions. Uh, I even tried SkyNews, the first people to take it actually were television on January 7th of last year when I, uh, wanted them to have it because it was clear that Hunter had a spy inside Swedish house — which houses the Swedish inland embassies and the Swedish ambassador’s residence. So they were the first media outlet to I give it to. Then I flew it out to the Daily Mail of London on March 3rd of last year, they did a forensic, uh, survey of it, which I think you had in your open. Then on June 16th, I gave it to the Washington Post in, uh, their boardroom present were Tom Hamburger, Peter Walton, the national editor who I put it in his hand. Later on, a few weeks later, I gave it to Chuck Grassley and the minority members on the [Senate] Judiciary Committee on the 8th of July. I never heard back from them even one time.

And those are really the only major news outlets that I was able to give it to — because the others have denied, uh, a willingness to take it up until the present day.

I did dump several hundred documents to the New York Times in early February — when I saw that they were had a FOIA request out on [former FBI Director] Louis Freeh and Romania and, uh, a guy named Povescu (?) and the State Department. Louis Free was up to his ears in that operation, which was to get a criminal compatriot of Hunters out of jail who had been put it there by a female prosecutor, a very good prosecutor in the spring of 2016 — which your viewers should understand is the same spring that, uh, the US government, including Vice President Biden were threatening the Ukrainian government, telling them they had to fire the prosecutor who was going after Hunter's other corrupt partner in Ukraine, Zlochevsky, the chairman of Barista.

So I sent the New York Times multiple, uh, uh, documents. I wanted them to be up to speed. They did respond. They asked me to keep sending them, but I, I never actually heard back from anyone other than by text.

EMERALD: Now, let me ask you just to clarify the story for our viewers. You came to be in possession of the laptop because you were asked by mayor Rudy Giuliani and former New York police commissioner, Bernie Kerik, to help them get into the laptop. Is that correct? They weren't able to access it though. They had it,

MAXEY: That is correct. And, uh, they offered a copy to Steve Bannon and I, and Steve said, look, if you want someone to look at it, have my guy Maxy, look at it. I did first person, I called down to help me verify was SamFatas — a very well renowned CIA operator. And we, I looked at at first and it was clear that it was real. I found multiple criminal actions inside the broker dealer, Rosemont Seneca. And, later we found more and more and more. Uh, Sam also agreed with me instantly that it was real. Now this was on, or about, the 15th of October 20, 2020. Two days later, we had two articles in the New York Post on the 17th and 18th. And on the morning of the 19th, Brennan, Clapper, Hayden, Panetta, and 46 other intel professionals wrote a letter through Politico declaring that, in their judgment, this was a fabrication of Russian intelligence. For your listeners who were wondering about election interference, stop wasting your time on the recount — the election interference came from our own intelligence services.".......

More here. "In my opinion, it is Maxey’s forensic review of the data and statements about making it all public, that triggered/pressured the collective western media to begin admitting the laptop issues were real and start covering the details."

There Is Something Very Troublesome About the Western Govt, Post-COVID, Rules-Based Order - The Last Refuge (theconservativetreehouse.com)

"The word ‘autocracy‘, with all its variants, has been used a lot frequently by western government politicians as they attack the ideology of Russia, China and essentially every national leader who does not join their “rules-based order” club.  There is so much linguistic repetition from the same western leadership, it’s impossible not to see this autocracy narrative as some form of talking point that stemmed from some G7 or NATO collaboration meeting.

It does not seem coincidental the new catch phrases of “autocracy” vs “rules-based order” surfaced at the tail end of the COVID crisis, when Build Back Better shifted from a talking point into an actual set of western legislative constructs  perhaps intended to codify the emergency powers those same officials deployed.

What kind of democracy, or rules-based order mindset, was the European Commission carrying when they decried the overwhelming national election in Hungary?  Surely if the EU wanted to celebrate democracy, they would cheer for the high voter turnout that reelected Prime Minister Viktor Orban, yet they did exactly the opposite.  Apparently, some democracies are more valued than others.

At the same time the EU is clutching pearls over the results in Hungary, another western ally, Canada, is codifying the government’s emergency act power to seize property without due process. 

Essentially, Bill 100 gives the Canadian government the power to seize your home, finances, bank accounts and assets if you take part in any form of protest that would create economic harm to any loosely defined entity.  Protest at the border, lose your house; at least that’s the threat they are about to make into a law.".......


"This "Rules-Based International Order" sounds intriguing--tell me more!"

This crowd that steals elections, uses secret police on opponents, stages wars and war crimes, sells their souls to Chy-Na and attacks humanity with a Bio-Weapon in the service of Unbridled Greed and Mad Powerlust just loves to blather on about their precious “Rules-Based International Order”. Fascist, please.

There are no “Rules”. It’s all Calvin-Ball with a thin and fading veneer of Civilization–the very Civilization they are destroying as fast as they can without making the frogs jump out.

They have Declared War on the peoples of the world.

It's time someone returned the favor.


"Someone...but who?"

Twitter Announces Elon Musk Appointed to Board of Directors - The Last Refuge:

“I’m excited to share that we’re appointing @elonmusk to our board!” Agrawal tweeted. “Through conversations with Elon in recent weeks, it became clear to us that he would bring great value to our Board.”  Musk is “both a passionate believer and intense critic of the service,” Agrawal added, “which is exactly what we need on Twitter, and in the boardroom, to make us stronger in the long-term.”

Agrawal is lying through his teeth. He's a fascist speech-ban monkey with control-freak fever:

“Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment… focus less on thinking about free speech, but thinking about how the times have changed.”–New Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal, Nov. 29, 2021

UPDATE--Ah. Now it's clear. Agrawal was trying to get Musk to join the Board to prevent him from turning Twitter into a Free Speech-zone. Musk declined.

Ace of Spades HQ (mu.nu):

Ace: "I do not think he is exaggerating to say that the threat Musk poses to The Regime is "existential." One cannot help but notice that The Regime is obsessed with silencing critics of The Regime -- what would The Regime do if everyone was allowed to speak against it, and be heard speaking against it?

Also agreeing: Tucker Carlson.

It's a good day in America, maybe a rare, good day. We're going to celebrate no matter what. Here's the context for why it's good--censorship. Censorship is essentially the hallmark of neoliberalism. Have you noticed that? Our leaders seem to spend a lot more time trying to control what we say and think than trying to improve our country and that means that anyone who orders the wrong words, even accidentally, gets fired or banned or ostracized or even charged with a crime. We've seen that, too. We don't need to give you more examples of it. They are literally everywhere.

If you live here, you're deeply familiar with it, but censorship now defines America's public conversation. We spend an awful lot of time complaining about that on the show. We probably don't spend enough time asking, what is this all about? Why are the authorities suddenly so intent on controlling our words? Why are they so afraid of free speech? This is a new thing and the answer is pretty simple. It's an act of self-preservation.

If voters were allowed to think for themselves, the entire system would teeter and possibly collapse...

Consider each of [the neoliberals' current catechism of lunacy] on its merit. Are the words actually true? Do they correspond to reality? Observed reality? No, they don't. None of them do. In fact, they're ridiculous. They're laughable and that would be very obvious to all of us if we were allowed to think about it, but we're not allowed to think about it. Effectively, all rational scrutiny of the regime's claims have been banned with the help of so-called news organizations. Our social media platforms, which once promised to give every American a voice, now function like the North Korean State News Agency. They're organs of propaganda. This crept up on us and it caught a lot of people by surprise, particularly conservatives.

Conservatives were taught from a very young age to support big business because big business was a bulwark against government overreach and that made sense and it was true for quite a while, but very few imagine what it would look like if big business harnessed monopoly power and then joined that power with government power to strip us of our constitutional rights.

Again, this happened incrementally, but now it's here. So these aren't really free market companies. They resemble repressive governments....

Elon Musk, who's the head of Tesla and SpaceX, famously a billionaire, just announced he has bought an almost 10% stake in Twitter. That makes him the largest shareholder of Twitter. So why does this matter? Well, because Twitter matters, whether you want it to or not. Twitter is hardly the largest social media platform, but Twitter sets the tone for all news coverage, for all information.

Twitter is where a professional class goes to learn which opinions are acceptable and which are forbidden and the effect is obvious to everybody. If our public conversation suddenly seems stilted and one-sided, it is because in part Twitter itself is so stilted and so one-sided. Anyone who dares express a heterodox opinion, even if it's true, gets banned. We found that out last week the hard way.

So, whatever you think or think you think of Elon Musk, he certainly understands that. "Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square," he wrote recently, "failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy." That is true. Twitter shares surged nearly 30% on the news of Elon Musk's purchase, so for him, it turned out to be a pretty good buy, but it's hard to imagine that Musk bought Twitter shares for the investment. He's already the world's richest man. He does not need the money.

Could this be the first move in a hostile takeover of Twitter that transforms Twitter into a platform for free speech? Seems that way. Elon Musk is not an Orthodox conservative, but he sees the people in power with devastating clarity. A few months ago, he described wokeness, that is to say, the ideology at the heart of Twitter's business operations, as "one of the greatest threats to modern civilization."

ELON MUSK: It is a prevalent mind virus and arguably one of the biggest threats to modern civilization. So, do we want a humorless, a society that is simply rife with condemnation and hate basically? At its heart, wokeness is divisive, exclusionary and hateful. It basically gives mean people a reason, it gives them a shield to be mean and cruel, armored in false virtue.

When was the last time you heard a crisper and more precise definition than that? "Wokeness gives mean people a shield to be mean and cruel, armored in false virtue." Not a lot of CEOs talk this way, in fact, none. They're not allowed. The fact that a CEO who does talk this way may take over one of the most important communications platforms in the United States is cause for celebration, real celebration.

Censors are powerful, but it turns out they may not be all powerful. So, what happens next? Let's be very clear, this is not a business transaction. It's much bigger than that. Elon Musk is a massive threat to the way things are. So, by definition, it will not be long before they are calling him a racist. You can mark your calendar, Tonight, there are Democratic operatives studying everything Elon Musk has ever said in public. They're preparing one of the nastiest campaigns of character assassination in memory. They have no choice but to do this.

Restoring free speech to Twitter is the greatest possible threat to the people in charge. They have to control the information. If they don't, they fall. So, you're going to be hearing a lot about Elon Musk in coming days, and all of it will be negative. At some point, they're going to unearth this clip from the Babylon Bee's podcast back in December. They'll tell you this is some kind of fascist talk or dangerous ethno-nationalism. We'll let you judge for yourself.

One Panic after another, one Crisis after another.

They will not let the Panics end or the Crises stop because the second they give us a chance to catch our breath and think about the scope of their failures, betrayals, and treasons, we'll strip the very bark off them.".......

ACE-UPDATE FROM TODAY:

Earlier this week, Tucker Carlson said that The Regime's agenda is toxically unpopular and the stench of their disgusting incompetence is no longer capable of being ignored.

To remain in power, The Regime must simply outlaw any mention of its failures and treasons.

That's all The Regime does now. That's all it can do to save itself. All of its other priorities are secondary to the mission of self-preservation, and the mission of self-preservation requires endless censorship and Thought Surveillance.

He predicted that The Regime would start hurling accusations at Elon Musk, accusing him of being racist and sexist and homophobic and anti-trans and all the rest of it.

Despite him seeming like a fairly conventional freedom-oriented Silicon Valley normie.

They cannot allow their prize of Twitter to become a censorship-free space.

And guess what The Regime has begun doing?

Joe Biden Is Worse than Putin › American Greatness--Josiah Lippincott:

“Vladimir Putin never mandated that I submit to nonconsensual medical treatment to keep my livelihood. Putin didn’t ban me from social media for criticizing the regime. It wasn’t Putin who eviscerated my years of saving with skyrocketing inflation. 

Joe Biden did.

Kiev is 5,000 miles away from where I sit in southeastern Michigan. I pray the conflict ends swiftly and with minimal loss of life, but that should be the extent of my involvement. The war between Ukraine and Russia is not my fight. Putin’s rule in Russia is not my problem. 

Joe Biden’s reign is.
 
Contrary to the claims of historian Jon Meacham, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia is not a battle between autocracy and democracy. Instead, it is a conflict between dictators on all sides. Joe Biden, no less than Vladimir Putin, governs through edict and fiat. In the past two years, the entire nation has been governed under a persistent state of emergency. No legislature anywhere in America ever voted for lockdowns or mask mandates. Congress has never voted to require COVID vaccines for either public or private employees.

Over and over again, Americans have been subjected to draconian regulations of their private lives by unelected bureaucrats and executive officials who claim unlimited emergency powers. In Michigan in 2020, there were no churches open for Easter service—by the order of the governor.

Twitter bluechecks and liberals can spare me their righteous indignation in the name of freedom. Mindless blatherers, all. Their “liberal democracy” is neither liberal nor democratic. 

George Washington in his Farewell Address presents a far more sober and measured take on America’s role in the world than the bleating of our current chattering class and its childish World War II metaphors. America, he argued, should avoid “habitual hatred or habitual fondness” toward other regimes in order to avoid enslaving itself to foreign interests. Slavery to animosity or affection clouds our understanding of our real interests.

Washington was entirely correct. The Left’s vicious and crazed hatred of Putin, an offshoot of their boiling resentment of Donald Trump, prevents them from seeing clearly how little connection the United States has to eastern European politics. Ukraine’s border security and the squabbles between its ethnic groups is not America’s business. Our business is to defend our own rights.”……. Read it all.

Actually, I think the Obama/Clinton/McCain Syndicate turned on Putin when he wouldn’t let Sotero of Arabia take over Syria in 2015. Nobody–except Khadafy– had ever refused their offer to join the He-Man Globalists Club before!

btw, here’s the full Washington quote: 

“The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interests.” ~ George Washington

The Globo-Grifter Class don’t really give a shit about Ukraine or Ukrainians except as their own personal Crime Spree Disneyland.




"Of those thousands who were lost or marked by that war, those were some of mine. They and the rest of the men in my unit were brave and it was an honor to serve with them, yet I cannot forget that our actions downrange were in service to policies built upon a great deal of lies and treachery. We were betrayed then. And we are being betrayed again.

I recall how vehemently anti-war the Left was then, and how the Jon Stewarts and other court eunuchs used the issue as a means to attack my people and reveal their master’s pivot from pretending to give a damn about the working class and what remains of small-town and rural folk to displaying their true contempt for us as Kulaks. The indisputable fact of their recent conversion to brute hawkishness reveals the truth of something David Reaboi noted, riffing on Lee Smith: “The Democratic Party doesn’t have foreign enemies. They have foreigners who remind them of domestic enemies.” 

I’d say that’s about right. There’s a bloodlust running like a current through those identifying with the party that was clearly stoked in them by the Managerial Class. I swear, you can’t swing a dead cat without hitting three freshly activated Manchurian Candidates ready to put their war-boner on the world. I am convinced it is demonic. Yesterday at my Normie-Job I heard an 80-something year old woman read aloud an article about how a cruise line would no longer offer stops in St. Petersberg, and would cost the Russian people there millions of dollars in lost revenue. She was almost gloating about the prospect of the impoverishment of those affected. A week ago she was deathly afraid of Covid and lamenting a friend’s refusal to take the ‘vaccine’. From what I understand, she was a former school teacher. 

As bad as that is, it troubles me even more to see it from officials ostensibly on our side of the aisle. A schizophrenic coalition representing the Grift-Industrial Complex with a crooked-ass elderly dementia patient for a spokesman has been rolling into a midterm election season with low approval ratings due to their sheer incompetence and corruption, and no sooner than they call for blood against foreigners, RINOs fall in line with them, ready to snatch a defeat from the jaws of victory like the Jobronis they are. 

The fools can’t seem to grasp that the Globalist-Left is not only on the brink of starting a war in which Red State sons would disproportionately be paying America’s butcher’s bill, but the tools developed in GWOT and refined in the plot against President Trumpthe Canadian Trucker Protest, and now Russia will be directed against people like us who object to living under the diktats of GloboHomo. They will run headlong to secure the borders of Ukraine or Taiwan (or rather, send others to do so), yet when it comes to doing something about those who have declared war on us here at home, suddenly their martial vigor fails them and they sit like good little school boys awaiting instruction from their teacher. They let their enemies tell them who they should fight, then wonder why they always seem to lose. Charlie Brown had more self-awareness. In a way, I suspect it must be a bit of a relief for some. Having a faraway spectacle elsewhere offers a distraction from just how corrupt the ruling class is here and dulls the messy responsibility of having to do something about it.".......

Read it all.

The moment they lost control of the covid narrative. Cue a war. Straight from one crisis to the next. A scripted reality show sacrificing innocent lives for unquenchable greed. Endless power grabs. No accountability. Devastated economies. Never give up freedom for fear.
Image

Isn't it odd that the thing that triggered Impeachment was Actual President Trump talking to Zelensky about the BidenSwamp's corruption in the Ukraine?

The Occupation Junta keeps insisting Putin is about to use Chemical Weapons.

There is Chemical Warfare going on. It is killing tens of thousands of Americans right now. But it’s not by Muh Russians(tm).

It is called “Fentanyl”.

Why, it’s almost as if the Chinese manufacturers and Cartel distributors had a highly-placed agent in our government, a big guy who was getting 10% or so to protect the supply routes.

See–Joe can run a supply chain when he wants to.

ps; I think smuggling humans and drugs was one of the major motivations for the Election Fraud Coup. Actual PDT was messing with their money.

And their slaves.


Patriots Day, April 19th - Mr. Paul Revere Explains The Battle of Lexington and Concord in His Own Words - The Last Refuge 

"In the Winter, towards the Spring, we frequently took Turns, two and two, to Watch the Soldiers, By patrolling the Streets all night. The Saturday Night preceding the 19th of April, about 12 o'Clock at Night, the Boats belonging to the Transports were all launched, & carried under the Sterns of the Men of War. (They had been previously hauled up & repaired). We likewise found that the Grenadiers and light Infantry were all taken off duty. From these movements, we expected something serious was to be transacted. 

On Tuesday evening, the 18th, it was observed, that a number of Soldiers were marching towards the bottom of the Common. About 10 o’Clock, Dr. Warren Sent in great haste for me, and begged that I would immediately Set off for Lexington, where Messrs. Hancock & Adams were, and acquaint them of the Movement, and that it was thought they were the objects. When I got to Dr. Warren’s house, I found he had sent an express by land to Lexington – a Mr. Wm. Dawes.

The Sunday before, by desire of Dr. Warren, I had been to Lexington, to Mess. Hancock and Adams, who were at the Rev. Mr. Clark’s. I returned at Night thro Charlestown; there I agreed with a Col. Conant, & some other Gentlemen, in Charleston, that if the British went out by Water, we would shew two Lanterns in the North Church Steeple; if by Land, one, as a Signal; for we were apprehensive it would be difficult to Cross the Charles River, or get over Boston neck.".......

It's good to hear of an American Intelligence Community that's pro-Liberty for a change--even if it is two and a half-centuries old.

Meanwhile, the Swamp has just confirmed Judge Jumanji Baby-Raper to the Supreme Court. In fairness, though, under our system, a president is entitled to a nominee who shares his pedophile philosophy.

CTH:

"Folks, the need for control is a reaction to fear.  The people in “fly over” country have joined with the coastal working class.  People are furious right now, from the guy that guides hunters, to the truck drivers, hammer swingers, mayors of towns and cities, and even state senators, legislatures and newly awakened citizens who are demanding action against this leftist onslaught.  The political pendulum has never, in the history of humanity, stayed on one side of a swing. The back lash from overreach has always been proportionate to how far off center it went before coming back … and right now we’re staring at a whole hell of a lot of the country (about 80-90% of the land mass, as well as about 70% of the population) that is fed up.  DC knows they are in a tenuous place, and they do not want that assembly deciding the only way to fix it is to burn it down and start over.  They are doing everything in their power, and beyond, to control and avoid it.".......

"One if by land, two if by sea, three if by Pre-Scheduled Riots, Bio-Weapon Plandemic, Election Fraud Coup, Reichstag Ruse, Border Erasure, Vaxx Attack, Taliban Surrender, Economic Trainwreck, Food Fail and Ukrainian Shit Show." 


This is how Revolutions start.


The Hair

No comments:

Post a Comment