But What Do the Deep State and the Mullah State Have in Common?
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy..."--FBI Counterintelligence Deputy Peter Strzok
“Although this blind sedition was so small that a portion of the police force was able to nip it in the bud ... you can rest assured that your comrades in the Islamic Republic’s army would be ready to confront the dupes...”--IRI Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi
Odd--it's been days and still no tweet from Obama in support of Iran's young people.
Why, it's almost as if he supports the police state-regime instead of the people.
Hey, CNN; instead of your Capt. Ahab-quest to capture a picture of the Great White Backswing, how 'bout camping out in front of Pres. Boyfriend's house until he releases a statement in support of the Iran protestors?
It's the least Obama could do. After all, he bought the bullets they're shooting them with.
Wretchard has a theory that the Multi-Billion Dollar Tithe that Obama gave to his Ayatollah actually backfired. When the people saw how the Mullocracy looted all the money for terrorism and Swiss bank accounts, it helped spark this revolt.
It's a delicious Self-Licking Ice Cream Cone--the money that was meant to save the regime destroys the regime!
Ace of Spades: Iran Deploys Revolutionary Guards to Quell "Sedition"
...and Obama Deployed the FBI/FISA/Mueller Deep State Guards to Quell the Trump Movement "Sedition". That's the Mullah/Mueller link.
Both are criminal conspiracies to thwart legitimate mass movements for freedom. One in Iran, one in America. Yes, the details are different; for example, we don't shoot young dissenters in the street here, except for Seth Rich. But it's the same criminal impulse to cling to power at all costs.
And Obama backed them both.
Free Iran...and America, too!
Obama Omerta-UPDATE: Roger Simon:
"You would think the MSM -- writers, editors and personalities -- would be enthusiastic about such an uprising, opening up their pages and screens to its supporters and even cheering them on. That's what liberals used to do -- applaud democracy and freedom. The reason for this omertà -- or near omertà, to be accurate -- is obvious. The rebellion reflects poorly, to say the least, on Barack Obama. It's also obvious that these media people can't stand the idea that Donald Trump might be acting more compassionately in response to the Iran uprisings than Obama did in 2009, especially since it is clearly true the current administration is being more supportive and, dare I say it, more moral. So they and their Democratic Party colleagues invent excuses such as we must not say what we think publicly in order not to set back the protestors -- even as the protestors themselves are saying the exact opposite, praising the support of our government and Trump and asking for more.
The Iran situation today is yet more evidence that liberalism as we knew it, or thought we knew it, no longer exists. It is now just an angry stew of power-hungry Trump hate (or disdain for whoever they think their conservative adversaries are). Ideals mean nothing. Freedom means nothing, as long as your side wins. Exaggeration? Again, sadly no. No more obvious situation exists in the world today, not even North Korea, because the people of Iran in 2009 and even more now in 2018, with real calls for regime change, seem to be craving freedom -- and the supposedly freedom-loving friends of my youth are standing by ... because Barack Obama made a mistake and might look bad? What men and women of principle! Perhaps we should call them what they really are -- reactionaries.".......
I prefer "news molesters".
No comments:
Post a Comment