Sunday, January 28, 2018

A Legal Question

"As I was telling Melania this morning..."
"I know, I know--I already heard."
Can a Judge
...who ordered you to be wiretapped accept your guilty plea based on that wiretap evidence...without even informing you it was he who ordered it in the first place?

And why should such a judge remain on the bench?

sundance: "Judge Rudolph Contreras was recused from the case against General Mike Flynn. This recusal came five days after Judge Contreras accepted the initial pleading from Flynn. If sufficient judicial conflict existed on December 7th, why wasn’t that conflict present on December 1st, when Judge Contreras presided over Flynn’s initial pleading?

There is a very strong possibility that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was forcibly recused by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, because Contreras is also the FISA Court Judge who signed-off on the 2016 FISA application (warrant) that led to the wiretapping and surveillance of General Flynn."........

Gen. Flynn may choose not to fight this outrageous fraud, but he's got a good case.

This is legal Three-Card Monte.
Monte, Monte and Monte

No comments:

Post a Comment