Remember Me?

Remember Me!

Tim Cruz

                         "He lit up a room anywhere he went."  Denver Detective Donny Young with his family

Deputy Danny Oliver and Detective Michael Davis Jr.

Their widows went to Congress:
:

"The legislation was named in honor of Oliver and Davis. The Davis-Oliver Act attempted “to increase collaboration between local, state and federal officials in the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws.” The legislation has not yet passed." 

Their husbands were murdered in 2014.

Kate Steinle

Her government built a billion-dollar pier--and then let foreign criminals have the run of it. Nancy Pelosi essentially had to step over Kate's dead body to show up tonight and argue for more dead Americans, 

Kate's Law still hasn't passed, either.

Ellie Jean Bryant, 4

Daughter, Sister & Child

 Two years in jail.

Jamiel Shaw: 

Democrats don't care how many die. It's all about power. They're replacing you anyway.

They don't believe in borders because they no longer believe in America.

You do not defend what you do not love.

Thanks for remembering us, Mr. President

"This is a choice between right and wrong, justice and injustice. This is about whether we fulfill our sacred duty to the American citizens we serve. When I took the Oath of Office, I swore to protect our country. And that is what I will always do, so help me God." …….

The crime from Open Borders long ago went from anecdotal to a full-blown Crime Wave. That's why our prisons are chock-full of foreign criminals. Here is another real reason to oppose dissolving America:

UPDATE to 1787: From our Archives, 2009:

"Among other instances, it is known that hardly anything contributed more to the downfall of Rome than her precipitate communication of the privileges of citizenship to the inhabitants of Italy at large. And how terribly was Syracuse scourged by perpetual seditions, when, after the overthrow of the tyrants, a great number of foreigners were suddenly admitted to the rights of citizenship?"--Alexander Hamilton, legal immigrant, 1802

It's coming: "Comprehensive Immigration Reform".

How come we never get "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement"?

As always, we should learn what our Founders thought about it--after all, they wanted to populate a nation. As a conservative, I think that people are a blessing--but that doesn't mean anything goes. It takes time and space to make Americans and we need an orderly process instead the worst-of-both-worlds system we seem to be trapped in.

Our immigration problem was distilled perfectly when "the INS mailed forms notifying a Florida flight school that two September 11 terrorists had received approval to change their immigration status from "visitors" to "students" six months after the terrorists attacks." Our government was still operating on auto-pilot a half-year after Atta took his plane off of it.

And it still is today. The little-known secret is that millions of illegals did not enter illegally, but were granted permission to visit. When the permission ran out, nothing was done. Besides 9/11, I mean. We simply must get visas, immigration and naturalization right; it's no longer optional.

For example, I have serious misgivings about dual citizenship. If a man said "I love your wife as much as I love my own wife," what would we call such a man? Besides "Bill Clinton", I mean?

The Founders wrestled with almost all the issues that face us today. And their answer was patriotic assimilation.

In his excellent "Making Citizens: The Case for Patriotic Assimilation", Matthew Spalding of the Heritage Foundation examines the views and actions of our Founding Fathers:

"Naturalization—the idea of the foreigner becoming an equal citizen as if by nature, based on reciprocal and voluntary consent of the immigrant and the citizens of the welcoming nation—is entirely consistent with and follows logically from the political theory of the American Founding. Individuals have a natural right to emigrate from their homeland, but that does not entail a right to immigrate to this country without the consent of the American people as expressed through the laws of the United States. But with that consent, the concept of naturalization works differently than it does in other countries: While an alien can immigrate to France or Germany but never become truly French or German, an alien of any ethnic heritage or racial background can immigrate to the United States and become, in every sense of the term, an American. Such a transformation is possible in America because the very openness of liberty to diverse backgrounds and differences of opinion, including religious opinions, stems from (and allows an emphasis on) the commonly held political principles that make free government possible in the first place."

The Founders rejected restrictionism--but they also rejected a lawless free-for-all, the influx of criminals, the undue influence of foreign governments and the especially the tribal identity politics that are part and parcel of the current Democrat religion. 

We don't need another atrocious Senate immigration bill passed by Democrats with a handful of Republican votes, which would reward criminality, fund racialist and segregationist groups such as La Raza, prevent real enforcement and set up more and larger amnesties as far as the eye can see.

Democrats have largely given up on convincing current citizens, so they wish to import new voters and appeal to them through the politics of pigment and payoffs. This is politicians choosing voters instead of voters choosing politicians.

They wish to populate America with a flood-tide of those who have no particular allegiance to America. But we already have millions of people wandering the country with little or no loyalty to the nation--they're called "Democrats". And the hatred of America is taught as the standard curriculum in our expensive universities.

Others dream of an endless stream of cheap labor, even though it is rank materialism and anti-human to consider a potential countryman as a mere economic unit.

Some have simply resigned themselves to currying favor in a prospective Latino-majority country, even if that means turning this country into a Latin-style banana republic or oligarchy with government by graft and street-mob. And should this new majority arrive with our corrosive race-preference laws intact, that would create a Neo-Jim Crow regime. We don't need another racial majority with racial preferences. 

Many see illegal immigration as a humanitarian issue, as a form of charity--but charity must be freely given and freely received, not coerced or demanded. Our Founders asserted that all men were 'endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights', not that all 7 billion people on earth had the inalienable right to enter America next Tuesday afternoon. They would be aghast at claims of a legal right to illegality, and stupefied by claims of an absolute legal, moral and Constitutional right for every human on earth to enter this country at will, regardless of the rule of law, the Consent of the Governed or the moral fact that inalienable rights must always come with inalienable duties. Dr. Spalding again: 

"The American theory of citizenship necessitates that the words immigration and assimilation be linked in our political lexicon and closely connected in terms of public policy: Where there is one, there must be the other."...….

Chuck and Nancy did not offer one solution to the Border Crisis last night..

That's because for them, Open Borders aren't a problem; they are the solution to a problem.

UPDATE: Democrats agreed to give the president $1.8 billion.
The president of Iran.

There is No Wall Because Mitch McConnell Doesn't Want a Wall

While Mitt Romney Fails the Character Test With Flying Colors

The recent op-ed by Mittens was ostensibly about President Trump's character--but it was really about Mitt Romney's. Like so many things in Sewer City, the thing is not about what the thing is about.

Mitt n' Mitch, Mitch n' Mittens

Treehouse:

"Senate Leader Mitch McConnell has one major career alliance that has been unbroken and unchanged for well over two decades.  That alliance is with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and specifically with CoC President Tom Donohue.  [SEE HERE and SEE HERE].

Mitch McConnell is stealthily working against the efforts of President Donald Trump.  The effort is to support his primary Wall Street financial benefactor, Donohue. However, Mitch McConnell cannot directly be connected to underhanded efforts against President Trump because it would lead to: (A) questions about a confrontation; and (B) public exposure. [ex. think about how McConnell is blocking President Trump from recess appointments]

Mitch McConnell is up for election in 2020; in the exact same cycle as the reelection of President Trump.  If it became more obvious what McConnell is doing, there’s a strong, heck, guaranteed, likelihood Trump would be empowered to turn against McConnell.  Therefore Mitch McConnell has to be very careful about the visibility of how he undermines the President. Everything must have built in plausible deniability. ...

McConnell needed to test Romney’s commitment to the Decepticon club.  Romney passed the test.  Romney was rewarded with placement on the Senate Foreign Relations committee.  Those Senators who sit on this committee get the most financial benefit from foreign lobbying.".......

Bashing the president on command was Willard Romney's initiation fee, the price of admittance into the Mitch-y Mouse Club. That's why Romney walked it back the next day; what was said didn't matter so much as the fact that Mitt snapped to attention when ordered to do so by his new owners.

"I may be a clown named Willard, too--but at least I have principles!"

Mitch doesn't want a Wall or there would already be a Wall. He has a long history of back-stabbing true conservative policies, senators, candidates and movements like the Tea Party. This entire Three-Card Monte Budget Shuffle was cooked up by Ryan and McConnell to make sure we never control our borders. 

The Constitution says the House and the Senate shall present a bill to the president. Mitch says the House and the president shall present a bill to him. Games, always games. 

The Chamber of Commerce globalists want to extract every nickel they can and regard America as just another bus stop. 

To be sure, Chuck and Nancy are also on the corporate payroll. But they also want to institute Global Socialism. Their plan is to dissolve America by moving a billion permanent welfare recipients here and ruling forever through divide-and-conquer tribalism and payoffs. They'll figure out later how to stop the Islamic Supremacists from defenestrating the gays and molesting women at New Years celebrations. If Europe is any example, they'll solve it by outlawing the discussion.

Donald Trump stands athwart their evil $chemes yelling "MAGA!".

That's why they all hate the man.

And that's why we love him.

Tweedle

More: Tucker:  "Our leaders don’t care. We are ruled by mercenaries who feel no long-term obligation to the people they rule. They’re day traders. Substitute teachers. They’re just passing through. They have no skin in this game, and it shows."...…. 

Christopher Bedford: "When Trump debated Hillary Clinton on the border, he didn’t color his language with “act of love” or apologies for our law. “We have some bad hombres,” he told the country, “and we’re going to get them out.” The professionals were aghast. Large swathes of the country, however, agreed with him."...….

Ben Boychuk: "A president is not a king or the country’s dad, though heaven knows it sometimes feels that way. The “public character” of a nation is greater than one man – or at least it had better be. ...The greatness agenda is a disruptive agenda. It isn’t particularly “conservative.” It disrupts the status quo. It unsettles longstanding alliances. It makes guys like Mitt Romney uncomfortable. It’s also a necessary and overdue corrective.".......

Governor Jerry Brown: "...it had nothing to do with the law of California," the false words coming out of his mouth and falling to the ground where all the victims of his dereliction of duty had also died.

Democrats All Agree...With President Trump. Or at least, they used to--before they lost their minds, hardened their hearts and turned their back on their own country.

Derelict No More

UPDATE: Good to see Mitch finally get off his ass and help this President.

Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article223850775.html#storylink=cpy

https://www.whatfinger.net/single-post/2017/02/07/Democrats-Admit-They-All-Agree-with-Trumps-Immigration-Plan-and-Building-The-Wall-to-Stop-Illegals
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article223850775.html#storylink=cpy

Did Bunglin' Bob Mueller Get Our Marine in Moscow Arrested?

A: Da! Next Question, Comrade.

I don't trust Putin at all--and I trust Bob Mueller even less.

If the charges Mueller brought against the Russian Maria Butina and others are just as phony, corrupt and politicized as the frame-up charges he brought against Flynn and Papadopoulous--and there is no reason to believe they are not--then he is responsible for this retaliatory action by Moscow.

We do know that Mueller brought phony charges against some Russian firms just to frame President Trump. They were shocked when one of the companies demanded discovery against their malicious prosecution. These were supposed to be "Gimme"-prosecutions, slam-dunks just to get a headline to bash President Trump.

We're still waiting for charges to be brought against dastardly Russian Super-Spy Carter Page. Remember him? His espionage was the stated justification for the unprecedented wiretapping of an American presidential campaign. Yet he's forgotten now. Odd, isn't it?

And then there is Lorretta Lynch, sending Natalia Veselnitskya over to Trump Towers, with Glen Simpson starring as the taxi-driver, room service waiter, the switchboard operator and the concierge.

The part of the French Maid will be played by Russian Specialist Nellie Ohr!

The only real charges to come out of this were Manafort's piddling business charges that FBI Director Mueller had passed on decades ago--the same kind of charges Mueller is not pressing against Manafort's partners the Podestas.

The Mueller Fraud isn't a prosecution--it's a rear-guard counter-intelligence action to keep the Deep State coup-plotters out of jail. I don't know if Russians committed any crimes--they probably did, but its hard to know when the Obama/Clinton Deep State and this prosecutor are on a Constitutional Crime-Spree themselves. Any 2016 election meddling by the Russians pales into insignificance to the criminal meddling by our own government.

Every time Hillary Clinton commits a crime somebody else goes to jail for it. Jim Guy Tucker. Susan McDougal. Billy Dale. Charlie Trie. The Benghazi video-maker. Guccifer, to name but a few. This time, it's a Marine in Moscow named Paul Whelan. I hope he is freed soon.

And I hope this country is one day freed from the Deep State Seditionists and their hack prosecutors who got him put there with this mad fraud.

ps: Quick Civics lesson: In America, our Founders said all political power resides the People. We enacted a Constitution, loaning some of that power to the federal government. We vested an Executive with power over the Departments of Justice and State, not so they could operate as a president's private police or personal fiefdom as happened in the Obama Administration, but so voters could direct policy by electing a president and that president could then be held accountable to them for those policies.

But in no case did the People vest power in an unaccountable Department of Justice and a rogue prosecutor untethered from the Executive Branch--and never, NEVER one who would conduct his own foreign policy.

We have already seen Mueller and the DOJ announce actions against Russians specifically timed to affect foreign policy. They were timed to affect the president's meetings where Putin would be present in order to undermine any progress. Where do the Dept. of Justice and Mueller draw authority to run their own foreign policy? Certainly not from the Constitution--the American Constitution, anyway.

That tells me that Dirty Cop Mueller was probably hoping to provoke this response from Putin. It doesn't serve the interest of justice or of decency or of America--but it does serve the interest of the Deep State.

Here We Go-UPDATE: While determining how Paul Whelan's misery could best be transformed into a stick with which to beat the president (just as Mueller intended), CNN found a tweet in which Whelan tweaked CNN as "fake news". Hilarity ensues. Ace:

"(Camarota:)"I'm Not Taking This Personally:" Man Goes on CNN to Plead Case of Brother Imprisoned by Russia for Espionage;
Alisyn Camarota Derails Interview to Interrogate Him About An Old Tweet from His Brother Calling CNN "Fake News"

Well, that is the important thing here. Not that he's either, 1, a civilian falsely imprisoned by a country CNN pretends to oppose or 2, a patriot doing some level of espionage against a country CNN pretends to oppose, but that he once put up one snarky tweet accusing the clickbait and fake news emporium CNN of being fake news.

It sounds like Camarota is actually happy that Russia (a country CNN pretends to oppose) is delivering some Justice to this guy for having maligned CNN. She's actively campaigning for Russia (a country CNN pretends to oppose) to keep this guy locked up on Suspicion of Not Liking CNN." …….

"Let's light this thing!"